New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 672440 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Archived
Owner: ----
Closed: Jan 10
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

21.8% regression in oortonline at 435014:435082

Project Member Reported by jochen@chromium.org, Dec 8 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=672440

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgh7G09woM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win7-gpu-intel

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: failed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@435013  7863.33  432.435  27  good
chromium@435082  7860.0   472.652  27  bad

Bisect job ran on: winx64intel_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 672440

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...oortonline.gl..run oortonline
Test Metric: Total/http___oortonline.gl__run
Relative Change: 0.04%

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64intel_perf_bisect/builds/1247
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993845413195665792


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5831096892129280

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Didn't repro at all, tried without story filter.
Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Dec 15 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: failed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@435013  6057.62  1229.22  21  good
chromium@435082  5944.76  1388.71  21  bad

Bisect job ran on: winx64intel_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 672440

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests oortonline
Test Metric: Total/http___oortonline.gl__run
Relative Change: 1.86%

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64intel_perf_bisect/builds/1257
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993180391224205184


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5883079938277376

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Status: Archived (was: Untriaged)
Archiving issues older than 2 years with no owner or component.

Sign in to add a comment