Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
268% regression in v8.browsing_desktop at 436863:436892 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Dec 8 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993848760515232784
,
Dec 8 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@436862 42.6652 292.422 30 good chromium@436892 45.6716 293.099 30 bad Bisect job ran on: mac_10_10_perf_bisect Bug ID: 672426 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests v8.browsing_desktop Test Metric: v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_max/v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_max Relative Change: 7.05% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_10_10_perf_bisect/builds/2506 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993848760515232784 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6158777798098944 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Dec 15 2016
,
Jan 10
Archiving issues older than 2 years with no owner or component. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by ulan@google.com
, Dec 8 2016