Regression in memory.top_10_mobile in V8 Roll 424076..424078 |
|||||||
Issue descriptionGraphs: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/report?sid=099eb011556a14005958109db34096ba93d1edd1f0708ccbc6b63f6f1b28b831&start_rev=419544&end_rev=431789 Running bisect for range: 424076 - 424078, which has a v8 roll. Seems related to
,
Dec 8 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@424076 8073917 754789 27 good chromium@424078 8031589 884622 27 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Bug ID: 672278 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http.m.youtube.com.results.q.science memory.top_10_mobile Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/foreground/http_m_youtube_com_results_q_science Relative Change: 0.52% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/4421 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993891597656199808 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5257948404645888 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Dec 8 2016
So now we can't repro with bisect bots. Did I do something wrong?
,
Dec 8 2016
Same with this.
,
Dec 8 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993842759383603376
,
Dec 8 2016
Uhm the bisect doesn't seem to repro. The jump on the dashboard is +550 K roughly but the output in #2 says 40k. Kicked another bisect, but I think you are doing everything right.
,
Dec 8 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@424076 8057064 940294 27 good chromium@424078 8100129 829669 27 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Bug ID: 672278 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http.m.youtube.com.results.q.science memory.top_10_mobile Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/foreground/http_m_youtube_com_results_q_science Relative Change: 0.53% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/4426 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993842759383603376 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5864746081845248 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Dec 8 2016
40k jump again. Adding Simon in case he has ideas.
,
Dec 8 2016
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=672183 Had memory.top_10_mobile and system_health.memory_mobile both not reproducing via bisect until you got rid of --story-filter. I'll re-kick this.
,
Dec 8 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993804660038856320
,
Dec 9 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: failed
=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because Infra Failure: Step('Working on revision chromium@424075,v8@55af3c44c9.install ChromePublic.apk') returned 2
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.
===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision Mean Std Dev N Good?
chromium@424075 7613934 49277.6 8 good
chromium@424076 8186502 13381.8 5 bad
chromium@424077 8153017 138693 5 bad
chromium@424078 8136147 145287 5 bad
Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 672278
Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile
Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/foreground/http_m_youtube_com_results_q_science
Relative Change: 6.86%
Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/4429
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993804660038856320
Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5903318646259712
| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
| X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Dec 9 2016
Well, this is what we expected, it's the V8 roll. But we need to bisect all of these: https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+log/73a37f6c..e717dafa How does that work if you remove --story-filter?
,
Dec 9 2016
That failure message looks like https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=672529, where the builders have been producing invalid builds. The bisect won't be able to progress further until that's fixed unfortunately.
,
Dec 15 2016
re: #c12 Sorry, I missed your comment. Although root causes isn't known yet, running with --story-filter stops any of the other stories from running. They're supposed to be independent and thus, shouldn't matter if one or all of them run, but that's not the case right now.
,
Dec 19 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8992844203467519664
,
Dec 19 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@424075 7611066 62032.5 6 good chromium@424076 8162609 145972 6 bad chromium@424077 8130519 187458 6 bad chromium@424078 8185019 18369.0 6 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Bug ID: 672278 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/foreground/http_m_youtube_com_results_q_science Relative Change: 7.54% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/4472 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8992844203467519664 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6118896661168128 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Dec 19 2016
Is this related to crbug.com/664880?
,
Dec 19 2016
,
Feb 3 2017
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982632396182394016
,
Apr 11 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/foreground/http_m_youtube_com_results_q_science Revision Result N chromium@424076 8073917 +- 754789 27 good chromium@424078 8031589 +- 884622 27 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http.m.youtube.com.results.q.science memory.top_10_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982632396182394016 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5257948404645888 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jul 27 2017
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. |
|||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Dec 7 2016