Android apps do not have network connectivity when using 3G/4G USB dongle |
||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionVersion: 56.0.2920.0 dev Hardware: Asus C100P MINNIE F25-S6F-I4G-A6U Android apps on Chrome OS do not have any network connectivity when the Chromebook is relying on a 3G/4G USB dongle. In this case, user has a Sierra Wireless Aircard 340U connected to an Asus Chromebook Flip. The Android apps do not have network connectivity, but Chrome browser tabs connect to the Internet just fine. chrome://net-internals/#proxy shows a DIRECT connection.
,
Dec 7 2016
AFAIK we have not tested any LTE configurations as none of the relevant Chromebooks have an LTE modem built in. If this is necessary, could you please send me the aircard adapter + activated SIM? Thanks!
,
Dec 7 2016
If this objective here is to expose the cellular connectivity from ChromeOS to the Android container as a generic network connectivity (i.e. without specifically having Android to realize it's on cellular), it can probably be handled like how we expose Ethernet from ChromeOS to the Android container. As this issue isn't specifically related to Sierra Wireless Aircard 340U, we can test it using any external USB modem supported by ChromeOS.
,
Dec 7 2016
Correct, it's general network connectivity for the Android container when the Chromebook has a 3G/4G USB dongle. Any dongle should be able to reproduce this issue.
,
Dec 7 2016
Abhishek has volunteered to look at this next week.
,
May 25 2017
Hi all, We have a technical case with this issue and it looks like that certain 3g/4g modems are detected as ethernet and Android Apps work fine, while others are detected as cellular and the issue is present. Is there any updates on this issue, or is there something we can help with through the tech case? Thanks!
,
May 26 2017
They should just be seeing TYPE_ETHERNET inside the container. If you give me the dongle I can see what's happening.
,
May 26 2017
This is what I see in the arc-bugreport.txt. The first USB device is detected as 'cdc_ether' and connection succeeds while the second is detected as modem and connections fails: 1: <6>[ 1826.217341] usb 1-1: New USB device found, idVendor=12d1, idProduct=14db <6>[ 1826.217361] usb 1-1: New USB device strings: Mfr=4, Product=3, SerialNumber=0 <6>[ 1826.217373] usb 1-1: Product: HUAWEI Mobile <6>[ 1826.217382] usb 1-1: Manufacturer: Huawei Technologies <6>[ 1826.222147] platform vpd: Driver vpd requests probe deferral <6>[ 1826.300352] platform vpd: Driver vpd requests probe deferral <6>[ 1826.303295] cdc_ether 1-1:1.0 eth0: register 'cdc_ether' at usb-0000:00:14.0-1, CDC Ethernet Device, MA:Cx:xx:xx:xx:xx <6>[ 1826.303409] usbcore: registered new interface driver cdc_ether <6>[ 1826.306991] platform vpd: Driver vpd requests probe deferral 2: <6>[ 4248.847635] usb 1-1: new high-speed USB device number 7 using xhci_hcd <6>[ 4249.012470] usb 1-1: New USB device found, idVendor=12d1, idProduct=14fe <6>[ 4249.012489] usb 1-1: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3 <6>[ 4249.012502] usb 1-1: Product: HUAWEI_MOBILE <6>[ 4249.012519] usb 1-1: Manufacturer: HUAWEI_MOBILE <6>[ 4249.012533] usb 1-1: SerialNumber: 0123456789ABCDEF <6>[ 4249.064607] usb-storage 1-1:1.0: USB Mass Storage device detected <6>[ 4249.065095] scsi host1: usb-storage 1-1:1.0 <6>[ 4249.065541] platform vpd: Driver vpd requests probe deferral <6>[ 4249.152828] platform vpd: Driver vpd requests probe deferral <6>[ 4249.184389] usb 1-1: USB disconnect, device number 7 <6>[ 4249.949622] usb 1-1: new high-speed USB device number 8 using xhci_hcd <6>[ 4250.114456] usb 1-1: New USB device found, idVendor=12d1, idProduct=1506 <6>[ 4250.114475] usb 1-1: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=0 <6>[ 4250.114488] usb 1-1: Product: HUAWEI_MOBILE <6>[ 4250.114496] usb 1-1: Manufacturer: HUAWEI_MOBILE <6>[ 4250.201629] usb-storage 1-1:1.5: USB Mass Storage device detected <6>[ 4250.202141] scsi host2: usb-storage 1-1:1.5 <6>[ 4250.202622] platform vpd: Driver vpd requests probe deferral <6>[ 4250.202965] usb-storage 1-1:1.6: USB Mass Storage device detected <6>[ 4250.205502] scsi host3: usb-storage 1-1:1.6 <6>[ 4250.206440] platform vpd: Driver vpd requests probe deferral <6>[ 4250.233682] usbcore: registered new interface driver option <6>[ 4250.233739] usbserial: USB Serial support registered for GSM modem (1-port) <6>[ 4250.233868] option 1-1:1.0: GSM modem (1-port) converter detected <6>[ 4250.234384] usb 1-1: GSM modem (1-port) converter now attached to ttyUSB0 <6>[ 4250.234436] option 1-1:1.1: GSM modem (1-port) converter detected <6>[ 4250.234497] platform vpd: Driver vpd requests probe deferral <6>[ 4250.234768] usb 1-1: GSM modem (1-port) converter now attached to ttyUSB1 <6>[ 4250.234830] option 1-1:1.3: GSM modem (1-port) converter detected <6>[ 4250.234941] platform vpd: Driver vpd requests probe deferral <6>[ 4250.235110] usb 1-1: GSM modem (1-port) converter now attached to ttyUSB2 <6>[ 4250.235153] platform vpd: Driver vpd requests probe deferral <6>[ 4250.235154] option 1-1:1.4: GSM modem (1-port) converter detected <6>[ 4250.235446] usb 1-1: GSM modem (1-port) converter now attached to ttyUSB3
,
May 26 2017
Forgot to mention that both USB devices in comment #8 provide successful connectivity outside of the Arc container.
,
May 26 2017
Re#7 We have our own Huawei E3131 can bring it to MTV40 to use for a while on Tuesday.
,
May 30 2017
,
May 30 2017
The exact USB device models that reproduce the condition per comment #8 are: connection not available in the Arc container -- Huawei E3372 - CE0197 connection available in the Arc container -- Huawei EC315
,
Jun 1 2017
Attaching the logs here.
,
Aug 22 2017
hey, what's the latest on this bug? #10 - has this dongle been tested in MTV40 back in May? did this work / not? if it did, did it get interfaced as ETH or mobile data connection? #13 - what's the assessment on the logs (june 1st)? there seems to be a good analysis of logs in #8 (early may). so what are we doing with all this?
,
Aug 22 2017
[ Adding RBS M-61 to increase visibility. We need some kind of ETA on next steps ]
,
Aug 22 2017
The next step was clear. We need to provide eng with a reprodcible set of steps. Since this seemed to invovled specfici hardware, we asked the sales folks to send us that hardware. That remains the next step, let's please not change that...
,
Aug 22 2017
Ok. I'll get on Amazon and buy one then. Regards from my Mobile, PeterK
,
Aug 23 2017
,
Aug 24 2017
[Lets reassign the bug then to the person doing the next step]
,
Aug 31 2017
pkakasi@ were you able to source this part? Can we make this non-RBS till we have concrete repro steps?
,
Jan 30 2018
,
May 7 2018
Is there any progress with this issue that can be shared with customers?
,
May 7 2018
,
May 8 2018
Assigning to Dan as he owns this area now. Eng had requested repro steps and the dongle in question was never provided. Please don't ping again unless there are updates as requested in Comment #16.
,
Aug 3
This bug has an owner, thus, it's been triaged. Changing status to "assigned".
,
Dec 14
Hello! This bug is receiving this notice because there has been no acknowledgment of its existence in quite a bit of time - If you are currently working on this bug, please provide an update. - If you are currently affected by this bug, please update with your current symptoms and relevant logs. If there has been no updates provided by EOD Wednesday, 12/19/18 (5pm EST), this bug will be archived and can be re-opened at any time deemed necessary. Thank you!
,
Dec 20
Due to lack of action this bug has been Archived. If work is still being done on this issue or you are still experiencing this issue please feel free to re-open with the appropriate information. |
||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by edoan@chromium.org
, Dec 7 2016