Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
14.5% regression in blink_perf.parser at 434856:435481 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Dec 7 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993921789697946368
,
Dec 7 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@434855 1.70238 0.299395 25 good chromium@435481 1.68986 0.150007 25 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Bug ID: 672082 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.parser Test Metric: url-parser/url-parser Relative Change: 0.74% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/969 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993921789697946368 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4582138555400192 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Dec 7 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993911424613252368
,
Dec 7 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993911092465303104
,
Dec 7 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@434855 1.64282 0.223472 25 good chromium@435481 1.67584 0.153947 25 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Bug ID: 672082 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.parser Test Metric: url-parser/url-parser Relative Change: 2.01% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/971 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993921789697946368 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4582138555400192 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Dec 7 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@434400 1.65691 0.424684 25 good chromium@435700 1.68442 0.271436 25 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Bug ID: 672082 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.parser Test Metric: url-parser/url-parser Relative Change: 1.66% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/970 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993911424613252368 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5217124874715136 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Dec 8 2016
The ref build moves a bit later - I think this is probably just something to do with the bot.
,
Dec 8 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993809196255457200
,
Dec 9 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@434855 1.6835 0.370951 25 good chromium@435481 1.71143 0.237916 25 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Bug ID: 672082 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.parser Test Metric: url-parser/url-parser Relative Change: 1.66% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/975 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993921789697946368 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4582138555400192 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Dec 16 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993163442256496304
,
Dec 16 2016
=== PERF REGRESSION === === Auto-CCing suspected CL author juncai@chromium.org === Hi juncai@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. ===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : Use new wrapper types for web_bluetooth.mojom Author : juncai Commit description: This CL modified code to use new wrapper types for web_bluetooth.mojom. Also changed all instances of mojo::Array, mojo::String to std::vector, std::string since mojo::Array, mojo::String have been deprecated. BUG= 597053 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2506813003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#434892} Commit : 1ef7dd4b548d9ccd5e573bf053043ab79070ae08 Date : Tue Nov 29 04:31:49 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@434855 1.62425 0.340779 30 good chromium@434875 1.63121 0.248038 30 good chromium@434885 1.56367 0.3159 30 good chromium@434890 1.53578 0.278284 30 good chromium@434891 1.53799 0.236089 25 good chromium@434892 1.67106 0.331886 30 bad <-- chromium@434893 1.68979 0.312935 30 bad chromium@434895 1.68451 0.272566 25 bad chromium@434934 1.69246 0.322811 30 bad chromium@435012 1.71325 0.201686 30 bad chromium@435168 1.69449 0.198177 30 bad chromium@435481 1.70787 0.211409 30 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Bug ID: 672082 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.parser Test Metric: url-parser/url-parser Relative Change: 5.15% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/996 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993921789697946368 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4582138555400192 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982651757105641168 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by tdres...@chromium.org
, Dec 7 2016