Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
5.6%-8.3% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 435066:435139 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSplitting off from bug 670706 ; graph isn't particularly clear, but there might be a regression here.
,
Dec 7 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993979004073884400
,
Dec 7 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@435065 3207626 421491 27 good chromium@435139 3241355 734877 27 bad Bisect job ran on: android_one_perf_bisect Bug ID: 671851 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.social.twitter system_health.memory_mobile Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/browse_social/browse_social_twitter Relative Change: 1.05% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_one_perf_bisect/builds/1853 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993979004073884400 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6466376108081152 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Dec 13 2016
Most graphs have trended back to the pre-alert values but one is still a bit short. May be worth keeping an eye on for a few more days to see if it fully recovers.
,
Dec 15 2016
Bisect probably failed to reproduce due to crbug.com/671156 . Bisecting using --story-filter on system_health.memory_mobile fails to reproduce.
,
Jul 27 2017
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by qyears...@chromium.org
, Dec 7 2016