Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.9% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 436166:436166 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionThis alert only has one CL in its blamelist: r436166.
,
Dec 5 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8994095313922157968
,
Dec 5 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@436165 18529242 573556 27 good chromium@436166 18537510 441118 27 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus6_perf_bisect Bug ID: 671245 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=https.www.google.co.uk.hl.en.q.science memory.top_10_mobile Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:java_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/foreground/https_www_google_co_uk_hl_en_q_science Relative Change: 0.04% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus6_perf_bisect/builds/2802 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8994095313922157968 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6425229415415808 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Dec 6 2016
Looks like this one alert was noise or recovered. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by qyears...@chromium.org
, Dec 5 2016