New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 671230 link

Starred by 0 users

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Dec 2016
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

2.7% regression in tracing.tracing_with_debug_overhead at 436185:436189

Project Member Reported by qyears...@chromium.org, Dec 5 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: failed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev   N   Good?
chromium@436184  6312112  27623975  45  good
chromium@436189  6370324  27363008  45  bad

Bisect job ran on: mac_10_10_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 671230

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests tracing.tracing_with_debug_overhead
Test Metric: Total trace size in bytes_max/Total trace size in bytes_max
Relative Change: 0.92%

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_10_10_perf_bisect/builds/2499
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8994097731219046928


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5313004684443648

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Notes:
 - All of these alerts are on the same bot (chromium-rel-mac10).
 - This increase appears after another increase (bug 671057).
Looking at the individual page results, there's no clear increase on any one page. This may just be noise.

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: failed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev   N   Good?
chromium@436184  6159196  26783298  45  good
chromium@436189  6152016  23673888  36  bad

Bisect job ran on: mac_10_10_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 671230

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests tracing.tracing_with_debug_overhead
Test Metric: Total trace size in bytes_min/Total trace size in bytes_min
Relative Change: 0.12%

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_10_10_perf_bisect/builds/2501
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993986885588948304


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5869127619575808

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
Closing.  Levels have returned to where they were before this bug (though not the earlier, massive regression)
Project Member

Comment 10 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 11 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_10_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : tracing.tracing_with_debug_overhead
  Metric       : Total trace size in bytes_max/Total trace size in bytes_max

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@436184      6312112 +- 27623975      45      good
chromium@436189      6370324 +- 27363008      45      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests tracing.tracing_with_debug_overhead

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982620213174337104

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5313004684443648


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Sign in to add a comment