Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2.7% regression in tracing.tracing_with_debug_overhead at 436185:436189 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Dec 5 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8994097731219046928
,
Dec 5 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@436184 6312112 27623975 45 good chromium@436189 6370324 27363008 45 bad Bisect job ran on: mac_10_10_perf_bisect Bug ID: 671230 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests tracing.tracing_with_debug_overhead Test Metric: Total trace size in bytes_max/Total trace size in bytes_max Relative Change: 0.92% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_10_10_perf_bisect/builds/2499 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8994097731219046928 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5313004684443648 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Dec 6 2016
Notes: - All of these alerts are on the same bot (chromium-rel-mac10). - This increase appears after another increase (bug 671057).
,
Dec 6 2016
Looking at the individual page results, there's no clear increase on any one page. This may just be noise.
,
Dec 6 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993986885588948304
,
Dec 6 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@436184 6159196 26783298 45 good chromium@436189 6152016 23673888 36 bad Bisect job ran on: mac_10_10_perf_bisect Bug ID: 671230 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests tracing.tracing_with_debug_overhead Test Metric: Total trace size in bytes_min/Total trace size in bytes_min Relative Change: 0.12% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_10_10_perf_bisect/builds/2501 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993986885588948304 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5869127619575808 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Dec 13 2016
Closing. Levels have returned to where they were before this bug (though not the earlier, massive regression)
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982620213174337104
,
Apr 11 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: mac_10_10_perf_bisect Benchmark : tracing.tracing_with_debug_overhead Metric : Total trace size in bytes_max/Total trace size in bytes_max Revision Result N chromium@436184 6312112 +- 27623975 45 good chromium@436189 6370324 +- 27363008 45 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests tracing.tracing_with_debug_overhead Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982620213174337104 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5313004684443648 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by qyears...@chromium.org
, Dec 5 2016