Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
11.1%-39% regression in blink_perf.css at 435104:435108 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Dec 5 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8994156559938425856
,
Dec 5 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@435103 9853.63 1227.61 25 good chromium@435108 9877.14 1464.77 25 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Bug ID: 671058 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.css Test Metric: StyleSheetInsert-bootstrap/StyleSheetInsert-bootstrap Relative Change: 0.24% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/953 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8994156559938425856 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5907541169537024 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Dec 5 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8994096543598579888
,
Dec 5 2016
=== PERF REGRESSION === === Auto-CCing suspected CL author rob@robwu.nl === Hi rob@robwu.nl, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. ===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : Remove XSS from chrome://downloads Author : rob Commit description: BUG= 668653 CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=master.tryserver.chromium.linux:closure_compilation Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2526323004 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#435104} Commit : 6d9a7916b48581f72fda060a1210ebef7f89b229 Date : Tue Nov 29 23:26:44 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@435103 10160.1 1513.43 25 good chromium@435104 9933.0 792.873 25 bad <-- chromium@435105 9910.12 781.694 25 bad chromium@435106 9870.08 976.517 25 bad chromium@435108 9858.75 1407.19 25 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Bug ID: 671058 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.css Test Metric: StyleSheetInsert-bootstrap/StyleSheetInsert-bootstrap Relative Change: 2.97% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/960 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8994096543598579888 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5852071130038272 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Dec 5 2016
This isn't a real regression, was just noise caused by https://github.com/catapult-project/catapult/issues/3050. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by qyears...@chromium.org
, Dec 5 2016