Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
18.9%-312.7% regression in blink_perf.shadow_dom at 435444:435589 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Dec 4 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8994181270311495792
,
Dec 4 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@435536 113.567 275.861 25 good chromium@435569 114.535 279.113 25 bad Bisect job ran on: winx64intel_perf_bisect Bug ID: 671032 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.shadow_dom Test Metric: shadow-style-share-with-distribution/shadow-style-share-with-distribution Relative Change: 0.85% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64intel_perf_bisect/builds/1241 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8994181270311495792 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5787918008844288 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Dec 5 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8994155791821585936
,
Dec 5 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : Detect floats to avoid or clear due to negative margin top Author : robhogan Commit description: When a negative margin top pushes a block back up into its previous siblings we need to check for any floats in those siblings it now needs to avoid or clear. Previously we were just looking at its neighbour, we need to keep looking until we reach a sibling that we don't overlap. BUG= 666487 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2531953002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#435497} Commit : 3c8d298acf826fc5337c526b1016a03b37c2656a Date : Thu Dec 01 00:42:03 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@435468 70.8798 27.4305 25 good chromium@435494 70.8056 37.7519 25 good chromium@435496 68.7576 28.2779 25 good chromium@435497 177.074 440.802 25 bad <-- chromium@435498 176.046 443.503 25 bad chromium@435501 176.926 444.589 25 bad chromium@435507 180.438 457.71 25 bad chromium@435519 177.408 443.072 25 bad chromium@435569 178.677 445.038 25 bad Bisect job ran on: mac_hdd_perf_bisect Bug ID: 671032 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.shadow_dom Test Metric: shadow-style-share-with-distribution/shadow-style-share-with-distribution Relative Change: 152.08% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_hdd_perf_bisect/builds/901 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8994155791821585936 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6058897830313984 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982584715750560256 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by qyears...@chromium.org
, Dec 4 2016