Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
9.3% regression in tracing.tracing_with_debug_overhead at 435161:435722 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Dec 4 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8994181694333290704
,
Dec 4 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@435160 13189325 53205632 45 good chromium@435722 13179618 53136271 45 bad Bisect job ran on: winx64_zen_perf_bisect Bug ID: 671030 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests tracing.tracing_with_debug_overhead Test Metric: Total trace size in bytes_avg/Total trace size in bytes_avg Relative Change: 0.07% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64_zen_perf_bisect/builds/622 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8994181694333290704 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5290189415514112 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Dec 5 2016
One machine, ref results moved as well, bisect failed to reproduce.
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982624326671181920 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by qyears...@chromium.org
, Dec 4 2016