New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 670904 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Duplicate
Merged: issue 670905
Owner: ----
Closed: Dec 2016
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

40%-70.5% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 435244:435263

Project Member Reported by qyears...@chromium.org, Dec 3 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: failed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean      Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@435243  10883570  1359522  27  good
chromium@435263  11019214  2010219  27  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 670904

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.news.wikipedia system_health.memory_mobile
Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/load_news/load_news_wikipedia
Relative Change: 1.25%

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/948
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8994341511112946432


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5018154038722560

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Mergedinto: 670905
Status: Duplicate (was: Untriaged)

Sign in to add a comment