Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
40%-70.5% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 435244:435263 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Dec 3 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8994341511112946432
,
Dec 3 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@435243 10883570 1359522 27 good chromium@435263 11019214 2010219 27 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Bug ID: 670904 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.news.wikipedia system_health.memory_mobile Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/load_news/load_news_wikipedia Relative Change: 1.25% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/948 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8994341511112946432 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5018154038722560 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Dec 4 2016
,
Apr 10 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982659745574831904 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by qyears...@chromium.org
, Dec 3 2016