Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2.9%-6.7% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 435019:435120 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Dec 2 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8994364184844384944
,
Dec 2 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@435065 6260021 1297830 27 good chromium@435067 6160933 800560 27 bad Bisect job ran on: android_one_perf_bisect Bug ID: 670769 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http.www.amazon.com.gp.aw.s.k.nexus memory.top_10_mobile Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/foreground/http_www_amazon_com_gp_aw_s_k_nexus Relative Change: 1.58% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_one_perf_bisect/builds/1842 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8994364184844384944 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6733653097316352 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Dec 6 2016
Bisect failed to reproduce, both alerts look very noisy, no ref build results. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by qyears...@chromium.org
, Dec 2 2016