Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
27.2% regression in v8.browsing_mobile_ignition at 435133:435153 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Dec 2 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8994367318999395232
,
Dec 2 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@435132 3554629 687483 27 good chromium@435153 3566933 684236 27 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Bug ID: 670751 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.news.washingtonpost v8.browsing_mobile_ignition Test Metric: memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:code_and_metadata_size_max/browse_news/browse_news_washingtonpost Relative Change: 0.35% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/939 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8994367318999395232 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6413609045852160 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Dec 21 2016
This is due to a change in the configuration on nexus 5x bots.
,
Dec 21 2016
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by mythria@chromium.org
, Dec 2 2016