Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
77.2% regression in page_cycler_v2.intl_ko_th_vi at 435240:435468 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Dec 2 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8994369156669135056
,
Dec 2 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@435239 257.843 58.4854 27 good chromium@435468 249.993 68.4898 27 bad Bisect job ran on: mac_hdd_perf_bisect Bug ID: 670738 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...kenh14.vn.home.chn page_cycler_v2.intl_ko_th_vi Test Metric: timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___kenh14.vn_home.chn Relative Change: 3.04% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_hdd_perf_bisect/builds/897 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8994369156669135056 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4997609263988736 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Dec 4 2016
Recovered.
,
Apr 10 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982667373690323792
,
Apr 10 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: mac_hdd_perf_bisect Benchmark : page_cycler_v2.intl_ko_th_vi Metric : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___kenh14.vn_home.chn Revision Result N chromium@435239 257.843 +- 58.4854 27 good chromium@435468 249.993 +- 68.4898 27 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...kenh14.vn.home.chn page_cycler_v2.intl_ko_th_vi Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982667373690323792 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4997609263988736 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982576394492228512
,
Apr 11 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: mac_10_12_perf_bisect Benchmark : page_cycler_v2.intl_ko_th_vi Metric : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___kenh14.vn_home.chn Revision Result N chromium@435239 232.054 +- 79.1023 21 good chromium@435468 232.497 +- 75.7493 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...kenh14.vn.home.chn page_cycler_v2.intl_ko_th_vi Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982576394492228512 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4997609263988736 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by qyears...@chromium.org
, Dec 2 2016