New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 670706 link

Starred by 2 users

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Dec 2016
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

3.2%-135.9% regression in system_health.memory_mobile (jig-jag increase pattern) at 435104:435108

Project Member Reported by qyears...@chromium.org, Dec 2 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=670706

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgh5W1lgkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgx4-7oAoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgx9rF-AkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgh5Xf7goM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgp_qqtQoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgp5nKuQkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgx76duQkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgp4SssgkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgp4TBugoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgp63VsQoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgp6mz8ggM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgx4D5pgsM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgp-6bvAsM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgp5nepAoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgx66y3AgM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgx8O67AoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgh5XL9wsM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgx_O3sAkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgx8fcrgsM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgu--NnwoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICg-5HehgsM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgp5Cy-wgM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgp_rguQoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgp4Dq8AsM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgx8uZpwsM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgp82ZqwoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgx4qDuAsM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgp-zl5AoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgh4mKhgkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgx_XE-QsM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgx8SCsgsM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgx5HLhwkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICg-6y6wwoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgx_fFowoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgp6nqrQkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgx7_M-QgM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgx66X6ggM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgx-nRvAsM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgh8-XoAkM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-nexus5X

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: failed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@435103  3994583  3635.73  27  good
chromium@435108  3994390  3295.66  27  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 670706

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.news.hackernews system_health.memory_mobile
Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/load_news/load_news_hackernews
Relative Change: None

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/937
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8994372063884685392


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6738395412299776

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Note: These alerts show the same pattern as in several other recent bugs filed for system_health.memory_mobile; this should probably be combined with several other bugs.
Summary: 3.2%-135.9% regression in system_health.memory_mobile (jig-jag increase pattern) at 435104:435108 (was: 3.2%-135.9% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 435104:435108)
Likely related:
 bug 670764 
bug 670765
 bug 670905 
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
Non-Nexus 5X alerts split off into  bug 671851 . The jig-jag shape in the remaining graphs can be explained by https://github.com/catapult-project/catapult/issues/3050.

Sign in to add a comment