New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 670320 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Dec 2016
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

43.1%-686.6% regression in page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh at 433544:434574

Project Member Reported by lanwei@chromium.org, Dec 1 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: failed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@433543  22.1825  66.5871  27  good
chromium@434574  18.9899  14.3422  27  bad

Bisect job ran on: linux_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 670320

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.amazon.co.jp page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh
Test Metric: timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.amazon.co.jp
Relative Change: None

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/linux_perf_bisect/builds/6865
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8994460983789993120


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5305371923578880

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
All of the tests have either recovered or were already at previous levels.  Closing.

Sign in to add a comment