New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 669448 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Duplicate
Merged: issue 669129
Owner: ----
Closed: Dec 2016
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

22.7% regression in blink_perf.svg at 432961:433008

Project Member Reported by perezju@google.com, Nov 29 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 1 by perezju@google.com, Nov 29 2016

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=669448

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICg65DkqwsM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-nexus5X
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Nov 29 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: failed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@432960  232.625  11.7491  25  good
chromium@433008  232.811  10.7866  25  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 669448

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.svg
Test Metric: SvgHitTesting/SvgHitTesting
Relative Change: None

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/920
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8994662369652799664


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5881608198946816

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Nov 29 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: failed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@432831  231.265  10.6658  25  good
chromium@433008  232.96   16.6033  25  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 669448

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.svg
Test Metric: SvgHitTesting/SvgHitTesting
Relative Change: None

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/921
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8994658230863979056


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5775093572042752

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Mergedinto: 669129
Status: Duplicate (was: Untriaged)
Same as  issue 669129 , artificial changes due to recipe change in nexus5X bot, also recovered after fix.

Sign in to add a comment