New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 669240 link

Starred by 5 users

Issue metadata

Status: Fixed
Owner:
Closed: Nov 2017
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: Mac
Pri: 3
Type: Bug


Sign in to add a comment

Build Chrome against the macOS 10.12 SDK

Project Member Reported by erikc...@chromium.org, Nov 28 2016

Issue description

Breaking this out from  Issue 624049 , since this is probably going to be a lot of work on its own.
 
Blockedon: 680927
Project Member

Comment 2 by bugdroid1@chromium.org, Feb 8 2017

The following revision refers to this bug:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/62d09b768b1c27511fcaa6c9dd0cd30f093e8fbf

commit 62d09b768b1c27511fcaa6c9dd0cd30f093e8fbf
Author: justincohen <justincohen@chromium.org>
Date: Wed Feb 08 00:38:20 2017

[Mac hermetic] Latest ibtoold needs iPhoneSimulator platform files to compile mac xibs.

This appears to be necessary on macOS 10.12.3.

BUG= 669240 

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2683703003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#448821}

[modify] https://crrev.com/62d09b768b1c27511fcaa6c9dd0cd30f093e8fbf/build/package_mac_toolchain.py

Blockedon: 690082
Blockedon: 690085
Blockedon: 690086
Cc: justincohen@chromium.org
Project Member

Comment 7 by bugdroid1@chromium.org, Feb 13 2017

The following revision refers to this bug:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/ccbbfa2f4c2f0c8f5736d05a2f9886700d79e738

commit ccbbfa2f4c2f0c8f5736d05a2f9886700d79e738
Author: justincohen <justincohen@chromium.org>
Date: Mon Feb 13 20:51:43 2017

[Mac hermetic] Add iPhoneOS subset to mac hermetic toolchain.

Apparently `xcrun -sdk macosx10.12 --show-sdk-path` needs the iPhoneOS platform
as well.

BUG= 669240 

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2696693002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#450077}

[modify] https://crrev.com/ccbbfa2f4c2f0c8f5736d05a2f9886700d79e738/build/package_mac_toolchain.py

Project Member

Comment 8 by bugdroid1@chromium.org, Jul 7 2017

The following revision refers to this bug:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/92403640ba1c95cccb6c852a41ff5ffde467900f

commit 92403640ba1c95cccb6c852a41ff5ffde467900f
Author: erikchen <erikchen@chromium.org>
Date: Fri Jul 07 23:21:30 2017

Update macOS FYI toolchain bot to compile with 10.12 SDK.

BUG= 669240 

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2976533002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#485094}

[modify] https://crrev.com/92403640ba1c95cccb6c852a41ff5ffde467900f/tools/mb/mb_config.pyl

Project Member

Comment 9 by bugdroid1@chromium.org, Jul 10 2017

The following revision refers to this bug:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/e68b8951056caed4d22e8a41f7b0e3a6a606e6f9

commit e68b8951056caed4d22e8a41f7b0e3a6a606e6f9
Author: erikchen <erikchen@chromium.org>
Date: Mon Jul 10 21:51:20 2017

Fix mb config for macOS FYI bot.

Bug:  669240 
Change-Id: I34b33ec646ba7ab6c57af052bfe78380b15dcc48
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/565443
Reviewed-by: Dirk Pranke <dpranke@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Erik Chen <erikchen@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#485411}
[modify] https://crrev.com/e68b8951056caed4d22e8a41f7b0e3a6a606e6f9/tools/mb/mb_config.pyl

Cc: shrike@chromium.org
erikchen@ has fixed  Issue 680927  which was the last major blocker for changing the SDK (thank you erikchen@!). Let's not flip this switch, though, until we decide the milestone in which we want to do it. We definitely should not do it for M61.
Project Member

Comment 11 by bugdroid1@chromium.org, Jul 13 2017

The following revision refers to this bug:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/tools/build/+/6c141c66a1dd113a9f09e721c9b6051129b9033d

commit 6c141c66a1dd113a9f09e721c9b6051129b9033d
Author: erikchen <erikchen@chromium.org>
Date: Thu Jul 13 00:02:00 2017

Force builders that don't use the hermetic toolchain to choose an SDK.

Builders that don't use the hermetic toolchain cannot use the default Chromium
SDK, since that is dependent on the hermetic toolchain. There are two builders
that don't use the hermetic toolchain: webkit testers and webrtc. The former
expects the 10.10 SDK and the latter expects the 10.11 SDK.

Bug: chromium:669240 
Change-Id: I23db631294cffa559d06fc3b104a577e2713869d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/565656
Commit-Queue: Erik Chen <erikchen@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Dirk Pranke <dpranke@chromium.org>

[modify] https://crrev.com/6c141c66a1dd113a9f09e721c9b6051129b9033d/scripts/slave/recipe_modules/chromium_tests/chromium_webkit.py
[add] https://crrev.com/6c141c66a1dd113a9f09e721c9b6051129b9033d/scripts/slave/recipe_modules/chromium/tests/run_mb.expected/mac_force_toolchain_off_10_11.json
[modify] https://crrev.com/6c141c66a1dd113a9f09e721c9b6051129b9033d/scripts/slave/recipes/webrtc/standalone.expected/client_webrtc_perf_mac_10_11.json
[add] https://crrev.com/6c141c66a1dd113a9f09e721c9b6051129b9033d/scripts/slave/recipe_modules/chromium/tests/get_env.expected/goma_gce.json
[modify] https://crrev.com/6c141c66a1dd113a9f09e721c9b6051129b9033d/scripts/slave/recipes/webrtc/standalone.expected/client_webrtc_mac64_debug.json
[modify] https://crrev.com/6c141c66a1dd113a9f09e721c9b6051129b9033d/scripts/slave/recipe_modules/chromium_tests/tests/api/trybot_steps.expected/webkit_mac_trybot_no_hermetic_toolchain.json
[modify] https://crrev.com/6c141c66a1dd113a9f09e721c9b6051129b9033d/scripts/slave/recipes/webrtc/standalone.expected/tryserver_webrtc_mac_dbg.json
[modify] https://crrev.com/6c141c66a1dd113a9f09e721c9b6051129b9033d/scripts/slave/recipe_modules/chromium/tests/run_mb.py
[modify] https://crrev.com/6c141c66a1dd113a9f09e721c9b6051129b9033d/scripts/slave/recipes/webrtc/standalone.expected/tryserver_webrtc_mac_rel.json
[modify] https://crrev.com/6c141c66a1dd113a9f09e721c9b6051129b9033d/scripts/slave/recipes/webrtc/standalone.expected/client_webrtc_mac_asan.json
[add] https://crrev.com/6c141c66a1dd113a9f09e721c9b6051129b9033d/scripts/slave/recipe_modules/chromium/tests/get_env.expected/goma_staging.json
[modify] https://crrev.com/6c141c66a1dd113a9f09e721c9b6051129b9033d/scripts/slave/recipes/chromium_trybot.expected/use_skia_patch_on_blink_trybot.json
[modify] https://crrev.com/6c141c66a1dd113a9f09e721c9b6051129b9033d/scripts/slave/recipe_modules/chromium/config.py
[modify] https://crrev.com/6c141c66a1dd113a9f09e721c9b6051129b9033d/scripts/slave/recipes/webrtc/standalone.expected/client_webrtc_mac64_release.json
[add] https://crrev.com/6c141c66a1dd113a9f09e721c9b6051129b9033d/scripts/slave/recipe_modules/chromium/tests/get_env.expected/force_mac_toolchain_override.json
[modify] https://crrev.com/6c141c66a1dd113a9f09e721c9b6051129b9033d/scripts/slave/recipe_modules/webrtc/api.py
[add] https://crrev.com/6c141c66a1dd113a9f09e721c9b6051129b9033d/scripts/slave/recipe_modules/chromium/tests/get_env.expected/mac_force_toolchain_off_10_11.json
[modify] https://crrev.com/6c141c66a1dd113a9f09e721c9b6051129b9033d/scripts/slave/recipe_modules/chromium/tests/get_env.expected/basic.json
[add] https://crrev.com/6c141c66a1dd113a9f09e721c9b6051129b9033d/scripts/slave/recipe_modules/chromium/tests/run_mb.expected/mac_force_toolchain_off_10_10.json
[modify] https://crrev.com/6c141c66a1dd113a9f09e721c9b6051129b9033d/scripts/slave/recipes/webrtc/standalone.expected/tryserver_webrtc_mac_compile_dbg.json
[modify] https://crrev.com/6c141c66a1dd113a9f09e721c9b6051129b9033d/scripts/slave/recipe_modules/chromium/tests/configs.py
[modify] https://crrev.com/6c141c66a1dd113a9f09e721c9b6051129b9033d/scripts/slave/recipe_modules/chromium/tests/get_env.py
[modify] https://crrev.com/6c141c66a1dd113a9f09e721c9b6051129b9033d/scripts/slave/recipes/webrtc/standalone.expected/client_webrtc_mac64_release__large_tests_.json
[modify] https://crrev.com/6c141c66a1dd113a9f09e721c9b6051129b9033d/scripts/slave/recipe_modules/chromium/api.py
[add] https://crrev.com/6c141c66a1dd113a9f09e721c9b6051129b9033d/scripts/slave/recipe_modules/chromium/tests/get_env.expected/mac_force_toolchain_off_10_10.json
[add] https://crrev.com/6c141c66a1dd113a9f09e721c9b6051129b9033d/scripts/slave/recipe_modules/chromium/tests/get_env.expected/clang_tot.json
[modify] https://crrev.com/6c141c66a1dd113a9f09e721c9b6051129b9033d/scripts/slave/recipes/webrtc/standalone.expected/tryserver_webrtc_mac_compile_rel.json
[modify] https://crrev.com/6c141c66a1dd113a9f09e721c9b6051129b9033d/scripts/slave/recipes/chromium_trybot.expected/webkit_mac_trybot_no_hermetic_toolchain.json
[modify] https://crrev.com/6c141c66a1dd113a9f09e721c9b6051129b9033d/scripts/slave/recipes/chromium_trybot.expected/use_v8_patch_on_blink_trybot.json
[modify] https://crrev.com/6c141c66a1dd113a9f09e721c9b6051129b9033d/scripts/slave/README.recipes.md
[modify] https://crrev.com/6c141c66a1dd113a9f09e721c9b6051129b9033d/scripts/slave/recipes/webrtc/standalone.expected/tryserver_webrtc_mac_asan.json
[modify] https://crrev.com/6c141c66a1dd113a9f09e721c9b6051129b9033d/scripts/slave/recipes/webrtc/standalone.expected/tryserver_webrtc_mac_baremetal.json

Project Member

Comment 12 by bugdroid1@chromium.org, Jul 13 2017

The following revision refers to this bug:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/a5ba3a6569a8d7c10d82456bd75bde28704083fd

commit a5ba3a6569a8d7c10d82456bd75bde28704083fd
Author: Erik Chen <erikchen@chromium.org>
Date: Thu Jul 13 06:30:01 2017

Allow macOS default SDK to be set from environment variable.

Some infra builders do not support the hermetic toolchain yet, so they also will
not be able to support the SDK roll when that happens. They will need to force a
different SDK based on their local version of Xcode.

Bug:  669240 
Change-Id: Ibeb1dde1cc9bd76bced37a5ed1797000e6e46f83
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/567390
Reviewed-by: Dirk Pranke <dpranke@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Erik Chen <erikchen@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#486291}
[modify] https://crrev.com/a5ba3a6569a8d7c10d82456bd75bde28704083fd/build_overrides/build.gni

Project Member

Comment 13 by bugdroid1@chromium.org, Jul 14 2017

The following revision refers to this bug:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/f2c89114be7dbb8f239677d433f096fbceab6673

commit f2c89114be7dbb8f239677d433f096fbceab6673
Author: erikchen <erikchen@chromium.org>
Date: Fri Jul 14 01:02:56 2017

Fix synthetic pinch events for macOS.

A recent change to pinch event handling on macOS
(https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/567241) started checking for the
"phase" property. That was not defined for SyntheticPinchEvent.

Bug:  669240 ,  742351 
Change-Id: I304f2d0aac8302521711101e62ec69f6fcf2dadc
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/571301
Reviewed-by: Avi Drissman <avi@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Erik Chen <erikchen@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#486571}
[modify] https://crrev.com/f2c89114be7dbb8f239677d433f096fbceab6673/content/browser/renderer_host/input/synthetic_gesture_target_mac.mm

Project Member

Comment 14 by bugdroid1@chromium.org, Jul 14 2017

The following revision refers to this bug:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc.git/+/bc266bc867354136bf14df0ccae5a58c9226a98d

commit bc266bc867354136bf14df0ccae5a58c9226a98d
Author: erikchen <erikchen@chromium.org>
Date: Fri Jul 14 21:29:23 2017

Remove deprecated macOS SDK overrides.

The same overrides now live in .gn.

Bug: chromium:669240 
Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2982863002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#19030}

[modify] https://crrev.com/bc266bc867354136bf14df0ccae5a58c9226a98d/build_overrides/build.gni

Project Member

Comment 15 by bugdroid1@chromium.org, Jul 15 2017

The following revision refers to this bug:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/2d245df79351a09a300805f1d991376cc476ac68

commit 2d245df79351a09a300805f1d991376cc476ac68
Author: Erik Chen <erikchen@chromium.org>
Date: Sat Jul 15 03:16:06 2017

Update availability annotations for macOS 10.12 SDK.

The 10.12 SDK adds new availability annotations for many existing methods.
Existing code must be updated with availability annotations to prevent
"-Wunguarded-availability" warnings from triggering when compiling against the
10.12 SDK.

For more details, see
https://clang.llvm.org/docs/LanguageExtensions.html#objective-c-available

TBR=avi@chromium.org, davidben@chromium.org, reillyg@chromium.org

Bug:  669240 , 735328 
Change-Id: Ifebb4a6f5b7f2171f0d0ba732c92d8ac79bc435f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/571316
Commit-Queue: Erik Chen <erikchen@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Erik Chen <erikchen@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Weber <thakis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#486974}
[modify] https://crrev.com/2d245df79351a09a300805f1d991376cc476ac68/chrome/browser/app_controller_mac.mm
[modify] https://crrev.com/2d245df79351a09a300805f1d991376cc476ac68/chrome/browser/ui/cocoa/bookmarks/bookmark_bubble_controller.h
[modify] https://crrev.com/2d245df79351a09a300805f1d991376cc476ac68/chrome/browser/ui/cocoa/bookmarks/bookmark_bubble_controller.mm
[modify] https://crrev.com/2d245df79351a09a300805f1d991376cc476ac68/chrome/browser/ui/cocoa/bookmarks/bookmark_bubble_controller_unittest.mm
[modify] https://crrev.com/2d245df79351a09a300805f1d991376cc476ac68/chrome/browser/ui/cocoa/bookmarks/bookmark_editor_base_controller.h
[modify] https://crrev.com/2d245df79351a09a300805f1d991376cc476ac68/chrome/browser/ui/cocoa/bookmarks/bookmark_editor_base_controller.mm
[modify] https://crrev.com/2d245df79351a09a300805f1d991376cc476ac68/chrome/browser/ui/cocoa/bookmarks/bookmark_editor_base_controller_unittest.mm
[modify] https://crrev.com/2d245df79351a09a300805f1d991376cc476ac68/chrome/browser/ui/cocoa/browser_window_touch_bar.h
[modify] https://crrev.com/2d245df79351a09a300805f1d991376cc476ac68/chrome/browser/ui/cocoa/browser_window_touch_bar.mm
[modify] https://crrev.com/2d245df79351a09a300805f1d991376cc476ac68/chrome/browser/ui/cocoa/browser_window_touch_bar_unittest.mm
[modify] https://crrev.com/2d245df79351a09a300805f1d991376cc476ac68/chrome/browser/ui/cocoa/content_settings/content_setting_bubble_cocoa.h
[modify] https://crrev.com/2d245df79351a09a300805f1d991376cc476ac68/chrome/browser/ui/cocoa/content_settings/content_setting_bubble_cocoa.mm
[modify] https://crrev.com/2d245df79351a09a300805f1d991376cc476ac68/chrome/browser/ui/cocoa/content_settings/content_setting_bubble_cocoa_browsertest.mm
[modify] https://crrev.com/2d245df79351a09a300805f1d991376cc476ac68/chrome/browser/ui/cocoa/framed_browser_window.mm
[modify] https://crrev.com/2d245df79351a09a300805f1d991376cc476ac68/chrome/browser/ui/cocoa/l10n_util.mm
[modify] https://crrev.com/2d245df79351a09a300805f1d991376cc476ac68/chrome/browser/ui/cocoa/location_bar/autocomplete_text_field_editor_unittest.mm
[modify] https://crrev.com/2d245df79351a09a300805f1d991376cc476ac68/content/browser/accessibility/browser_accessibility_cocoa.mm
[modify] https://crrev.com/2d245df79351a09a300805f1d991376cc476ac68/net/ssl/ssl_platform_key_mac.cc
[modify] https://crrev.com/2d245df79351a09a300805f1d991376cc476ac68/third_party/WebKit/Source/platform/fonts/mac/FontFamilyMatcherMac.mm
[modify] https://crrev.com/2d245df79351a09a300805f1d991376cc476ac68/ui/accelerated_widget_mac/BUILD.gn
[add] https://crrev.com/2d245df79351a09a300805f1d991376cc476ac68/ui/accelerated_widget_mac/availability_macros.h
[modify] https://crrev.com/2d245df79351a09a300805f1d991376cc476ac68/ui/accelerated_widget_mac/ca_layer_tree_coordinator.mm
[modify] https://crrev.com/2d245df79351a09a300805f1d991376cc476ac68/ui/accelerated_widget_mac/ca_layer_tree_unittest_mac.mm
[modify] https://crrev.com/2d245df79351a09a300805f1d991376cc476ac68/ui/accelerated_widget_mac/ca_renderer_layer_tree.h
[modify] https://crrev.com/2d245df79351a09a300805f1d991376cc476ac68/ui/accelerated_widget_mac/ca_renderer_layer_tree.mm
[modify] https://crrev.com/2d245df79351a09a300805f1d991376cc476ac68/ui/base/cocoa/touch_bar_forward_declarations.h
[modify] https://crrev.com/2d245df79351a09a300805f1d991376cc476ac68/ui/views/cocoa/bridged_content_view_touch_bar.mm
[modify] https://crrev.com/2d245df79351a09a300805f1d991376cc476ac68/ui/views/cocoa/bridged_native_widget.h
[modify] https://crrev.com/2d245df79351a09a300805f1d991376cc476ac68/ui/views/cocoa/bridged_native_widget.mm
[modify] https://crrev.com/2d245df79351a09a300805f1d991376cc476ac68/ui/views/cocoa/drag_drop_client_mac_unittest.mm
[modify] https://crrev.com/2d245df79351a09a300805f1d991376cc476ac68/ui/views/cocoa/native_widget_mac_nswindow.mm

Cc: mark@chromium.org rsesek@chromium.org thakis@chromium.org
We discussed this at the Mac bi-weekly. Given that M-61 is also going to be the release targeting High-Sierra, I didn't hear any objections to targeting M-62 for the SDK revision. 

I plan on landing the SDK change after M-61 branches.
Project Member

Comment 17 by bugdroid1@chromium.org, Jul 18 2017

The following revision refers to this bug:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/d2b3c76d21b548cf7f811199f818cb0cc4cb0788

commit d2b3c76d21b548cf7f811199f818cb0cc4cb0788
Author: erikchen <erikchen@chromium.org>
Date: Tue Jul 18 00:12:48 2017

Update availability annotations for macOS 10.12 SDK [part 2].

Due to a clang bug, adding the API_AVAILABLE annotation also changes the
visibility to be "default". This causes an unintentional leak of
global-visibility symbols. Explicitly re-specify "hidden" visibility to work
around this.

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33796

Bug:  669240 
Change-Id: I1118de5ddb6035402f8b787cece33e0bb040ff15
TBR: reillyg@chromium.org
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/574683
Commit-Queue: Erik Chen <erikchen@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Weber <thakis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#487309}
[modify] https://crrev.com/d2b3c76d21b548cf7f811199f818cb0cc4cb0788/services/shape_detection/barcode_detection_impl_mac.h
[modify] https://crrev.com/d2b3c76d21b548cf7f811199f818cb0cc4cb0788/services/shape_detection/barcode_detection_impl_mac.mm
[modify] https://crrev.com/d2b3c76d21b548cf7f811199f818cb0cc4cb0788/services/shape_detection/barcode_detection_impl_mac_unittest.mm
[modify] https://crrev.com/d2b3c76d21b548cf7f811199f818cb0cc4cb0788/services/shape_detection/text_detection_impl_mac.h
[modify] https://crrev.com/d2b3c76d21b548cf7f811199f818cb0cc4cb0788/services/shape_detection/text_detection_impl_mac.mm
[modify] https://crrev.com/d2b3c76d21b548cf7f811199f818cb0cc4cb0788/services/shape_detection/text_detection_impl_mac_unittest.mm
[modify] https://crrev.com/d2b3c76d21b548cf7f811199f818cb0cc4cb0788/ui/base/cocoa/touch_bar_util.h

> We discussed this at the Mac bi-weekly. Given that M-61 is also going to be the release targeting High-Sierra, I didn't hear any objections to targeting M-62 for the SDK revision. 

I have concerns about targeting M-62, which I want to discuss with you when we next meet. So M-62 might be when we want to flip this switch but it may not.
I'd be interested to hear about these concerns. Can you post them here?
It's one concern, really, which is that we'll have limited coverage of 10.13 in the canary, dev, and beta channels until High Sierra ships, which means reduced visibility of any issues the SDK switch causes on 10.13. In a real sense that's no different than what we have to deal with right now to catch 10.13 issues, but I also don't see there being an urgency to switching SDKs. That makes me inclined to want to wait for when we branch to M-62, which will likely be about the same time as when High Sierra ships.
If there's no reason to wait, shouldn't we default to progress?

Building with the latest SDK is Apple's official recommendation, and if we wait it'll be longer until we find issues (if they exist). If there are issues, it's fairly easy to move back to the old SDK if necessary.
> If there's no reason to wait, shouldn't we default to progress?

The reason to wait is to get more 10.13 coverage in the non-stable channels.

But we'll get that anyway, right? And since "use newest SDK" is Apple's recommendation, they probably tested apps built with the 10.12 SDK (the current stable SDK) on 10.13 a lot more than apps built with the 10.10 SDK.
(This is a fairly minor thing, but there's a small mess here that we'll be able to get rid of once we switch to a newer SDK:
https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/net/ssl/ssl_platform_key_mac.cc?rcl=861bce1518ab2209ba6fcdc7d0d99d9aa775c01b&l=81 )
> But we'll get that anyway, right?

I'm not sure what you mean. Our 10.13 coverage will be spotty at best between now and when 10.13 ships. We will start to get better coverage in the non-Stable channels around the time we branch to M-62. And regardless of Apple's technical recommendations or amount of testing they did of 10.12 apps on 10.13, there is no guarantee it will be smooth sailing for Chrome when we switch to the 10.12 SDK.

So, I am saying let's plan to flip the SDK switch in 6 weeks, when we'll start to get better coverage of 10.13 in the non-Stable channels.
 
shrike@, I believe the assumption that you are making is that switching to the 10.12 SDK is dangerous [w.r.t. 10.13], and we should refrain from making the switch until there are more 10.13 users.

I believe that it is more dangerous to *not* switch to the 10.12 SDK, since we are not going to pulling in the latest fixes/optimizations that are gated behind SDK link flags.

Regardless of whether to switch to the 10.12 SDK, we are going to have poor 10.13 coverage. My belief is that switching in M62 is less likely to produce problems that staying on the 10.10 SDK.
> I believe that it is more dangerous to *not* switch to the 10.12 SDK, since we are not going to pulling in the latest fixes/optimizations that are gated behind SDK link flags.

Thanks, that's what I was trying to say, but couldn't as succinctly.
Hello erikchen@,

> shrike@, I believe the assumption that you are making is that switching to the 10.12 SDK is dangerous [w.r.t. 10.13], and we should refrain from making the switch until there are more 10.13 users.

I am asserting that it is potentially dangerous to switch to the 10.12 SDK until there are more 10.13 users.

> I believe that it is more dangerous to *not* switch to the 10.12 SDK, since we are not going to pulling in the latest fixes/optimizations that are gated behind SDK link flags.

You are saying there's danger in running on 10.13 while linked against an older SDK. I won't say that not's possible, but if true Apple would have a lot of problems because the vast majority of Mac software will always be linked against older SDKs whenever a new version of macOS ships.

The contract you get with your current SDK is you will continue to work as you did before.

The contract you get by switching to the latest SDK is you will execute new code paths, your behavior may change, and you may have to fix problems.

Switching to the 10.12 SDK in M-62 has more potential pitfalls than not switching because we don't have great 10.13 coverage in pre-Stable channels.

Comment 29 by mark@chromium.org, Jul 19 2017

I see this as much less a “10.13 users” question than a “10.11 and 10.12 users” question. I wouldn’t anticipate the difference between 10.10 and 10.12 SDKs to have a substantially different effect on 10.13 users than it does for 10.12 users. On the other hand, judging from past experience, we’ll have more 10.12 users than 10.13 users until around the new year, and more (10.11+10.12) users until well into 2018. Assuming we’re moving to Xcode 8 or later, and we know that we can fix bugs for 10.11 and 10.12 users without breaking things, then I’d count that as a vote for updating the SDK. (But I’m making an assumption, I don’t know for sure what breaks with this change. I guess that’s what canary/dev/beta are for.)

I used to be much more conservative about this, but Apple’s recent refusal to support anything other than current SDKs has changed things. Because of that, I don’t think it’s reasonable to say that the vast majority of Mac software is linked against old SDKs. I’d expect that the majority of software released today is already linked against the 10.12 SDK, because that’s all you can get easily with the tools that Apple provides. Sure, when 10.13 comes out, approximately zero released software will be using that SDK, and linking against that SDK will result in behavior changes when running on 10.13 that we won’t have seen on older OS versions. But we’re not talking about upgrading to the 10.13 SDK (yet).
Hi mark@,

Sorry, you are right in what you're saying about 10.12. It is the case that the vast majority of apps will be built against the 10.13 SDK when 10.13 ships, but that is not relevant to deciding whether to stay on 10.11 or switch to 10.12.

Project Member

Comment 31 by bugdroid1@chromium.org, Jul 19 2017

The following revision refers to this bug:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/libyuv/libyuv.git/+/9288b884b6f23cbcb4eda33bf638ae4f198b7af3

commit 9288b884b6f23cbcb4eda33bf638ae4f198b7af3
Author: Frank Barchard <fbarchard@google.com>
Date: Wed Jul 19 18:04:24 2017

Roll chromium_revision 964fc7fe50..c138801d02 (478724:487352)

Change log: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/964fc7fe50..c138801d02
Full diff: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/964fc7fe50..c138801d02

Changed dependencies:
* src/base: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/base/+log/7830ef61f5..5b2c419308
* src/build: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/build/+log/b887a61b49..1808a907ce
* src/buildtools: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/buildtools.git/+log/b53a03df32..5ad14542a6
* src/ios: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/ios/+log/4243f190b3..bff0ead181
* src/testing: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/testing/+log/4d1ed658b7..aac324832e
* src/third_party: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/third_party/+log/d09084e5dd..1b11b0e214
* src/third_party/android_tools: https://chromium.googlesource.com/android_tools.git/+log/023e2f6540..e9d4018e14
* src/third_party/catapult: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/github.com/catapult-project/catapult.git/+log/7ba431f75d..b0acf6c12b
* src/tools: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/tools/+log/b8af3bf606..ec8ceaef71
* src/tools/swarming_client: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/swarming.client.git/+log/af6b06ca68..a56c2b39ca
DEPS diff: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/964fc7fe50..c138801d02/DEPS

Clang version changed 303910:307486
Details: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/964fc7fe50..c138801d02/tools/clang/scripts/update.py

TBR=kjellander@chromium.org
BUG= libyuv:710 ,  chromium:669240 


Change-Id: I117311a0fe61c3bdbf3a966ec2eb55100added51
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/574772
Reviewed-by: Frank Barchard <fbarchard@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Frank Barchard <fbarchard@google.com>

[modify] https://crrev.com/9288b884b6f23cbcb4eda33bf638ae4f198b7af3/DEPS

> but that is not relevant to deciding whether to stay on 10.11 or switch to 10.12.

Not directly. I was providing a counter-opinion to the portion of your #c28 that assumed that older SDKs have seen lots of testing on new OS versions. I don’t think that this is a valid assumption. When 10.13 is released, software built with the 10.12 SDK (more generally, one version down) will have seen lots of testing on 10.13 by Apple and others, but software built with the 10.10 SDK (as Chrome currently is) will not have.
Project Member

Comment 33 by bugdroid1@chromium.org, Jul 20 2017

The following revision refers to this bug:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/libyuv/libyuv.git/+/5f00523073995416859f58b43e83dd66e2078104

commit 5f00523073995416859f58b43e83dd66e2078104
Author: Frank Barchard <fbarchard@google.com>
Date: Thu Jul 20 22:26:41 2017

Remove deprecated macOS SDK overrides.

The same overrides now live in .gn.

TBR=kjellander@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:669240 
Change-Id: Ifaeb3b612571c3594f1e2279b4f871b7fd3e8d69
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/572080
Reviewed-by: Frank Barchard <fbarchard@google.com>

[modify] https://crrev.com/5f00523073995416859f58b43e83dd66e2078104/build_overrides/build.gni

shrike: Ping. I believe you were going to make a decision on this?
Blocking: 324079
Hello erikchen@,

Let's proceed with switching the base SDK to 10.12.

Building Chromium at master revision ff259bab (#488528) with 10.12 SDK I'm getting the attached build errors. Here's a sampling:

In file included from ../../chrome/browser/ui/cocoa/web_textfield_touch_bar_controller.mm:5:
../../chrome/browser/ui/cocoa/web_textfield_touch_bar_controller.h:31:4: error: 'NSTouchBar' is partial: introduced in macOS 10.12.2 [-Werror,-Wunguarded-availability]
- (NSTouchBar*)makeTouchBar;
   ^
../../../../../../../../Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.12.sdk/System/Library/Frameworks/AppKit.framework/Headers/NSTouchBar.h:19:12: note: 'NSTouchBar' has been explicitly marked partial here
@interface NSTouchBar : NSObject <NSCoding> {
           ^
../../chrome/browser/ui/cocoa/web_textfield_touch_bar_controller.h:31:1: note: annotate 'makeTouchBar' with an availability attribute to silence
- (NSTouchBar*)makeTouchBar;
^

mac_errors.rtf
31.3 KB Download
marshall: Are you synced up? chrome/browser/ui/cocoa/web_textfield_touch_bar_controller.h on trunk looks like

- (NSTouchBar*)makeTouchBar API_AVAILABLE(macos(10.12.2));

which does have the required availability attribute. (Fixed 2 days ago in https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/583850/)
Blockedon: 747693
@thakis: Thanks, I didn't see the fix from  issue #747693 .
Blockedon: 750242
Project Member

Comment 41 by bugdroid1@chromium.org, Aug 1 2017

The following revision refers to this bug:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/f5345de13668f0176b11126a7ae391dad5b4ad0f

commit f5345de13668f0176b11126a7ae391dad5b4ad0f
Author: erikchen <erikchen@chromium.org>
Date: Tue Aug 01 18:27:29 2017

Bump macOS SDK to 10.12.

Bug:  669240 
Change-Id: I97cf582b97fac7aec2aa92bbdda02f5c17482c1d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/570459
Reviewed-by: Erik Chen <erikchen@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Weber <thakis@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Erik Chen <erikchen@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#491060}
[modify] https://crrev.com/f5345de13668f0176b11126a7ae391dad5b4ad0f/build/config/mac/mac_sdk_overrides.gni
[modify] https://crrev.com/f5345de13668f0176b11126a7ae391dad5b4ad0f/chrome/browser/ui/cocoa/ssl_client_certificate_selector_cocoa.mm

This seems to cause rebaseline bots to fail, compare  issue 751421 .
Project Member

Comment 43 by bugdroid1@chromium.org, Aug 2 2017

The following revision refers to this bug:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/00068b7e6365c9ac4994e8f3ee94b8c8a275ab5a

commit 00068b7e6365c9ac4994e8f3ee94b8c8a275ab5a
Author: Aaron Gable <agable@chromium.org>
Date: Wed Aug 02 17:01:52 2017

Revert "Bump macOS SDK to 10.12."

This reverts commit f5345de13668f0176b11126a7ae391dad5b4ad0f.

Reason for revert: Breaks bots which run layout_tests
not via swarming:  https://crbug.com/751421 

Original change's description:
> Bump macOS SDK to 10.12.
> 
> Bug:  669240 
> Change-Id: I97cf582b97fac7aec2aa92bbdda02f5c17482c1d
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/570459
> Reviewed-by: Erik Chen <erikchen@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Nico Weber <thakis@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Erik Chen <erikchen@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#491060}

TBR=thakis@chromium.org,erikchen@chromium.org

Change-Id: I3b30bd3e18fa60f736078ed889a6c574b15c6467
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug:  669240 ,  751421 
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/598449
Commit-Queue: Aaron Gable <agable@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Gable <agable@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#491408}
[modify] https://crrev.com/00068b7e6365c9ac4994e8f3ee94b8c8a275ab5a/build/config/mac/mac_sdk_overrides.gni
[modify] https://crrev.com/00068b7e6365c9ac4994e8f3ee94b8c8a275ab5a/chrome/browser/ui/cocoa/ssl_client_certificate_selector_cocoa.mm

https://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.blink/builders/mac10.9_blink_rel/builds/3338

for the "gclient sync" step, we correctly set  'FORCE_MAC_SDK_MIN': '10.10', which is why that step doesn't fail.

But we're also going to need to add that flag to every step which may potentially touch the macOS SDK.
Project Member

Comment 45 by bugdroid1@chromium.org, Aug 2 2017

The following revision refers to this bug:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/tools/build/+/022bff279bb2d570f7a91caf13d0a2854c5fcffb

commit 022bff279bb2d570f7a91caf13d0a2854c5fcffb
Author: erikchen <erikchen@chromium.org>
Date: Wed Aug 02 19:07:07 2017

Make sure that FORCE_MAC_SDK is respected by the analyze step.

This was an oversight in the initial plumbing for FORCE_MAC_SDK.

Bug: chromium:669240 
Change-Id: I72d56b26b035fb83eb827062f20a69bdb59a1077
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/598590
Reviewed-by: Dirk Pranke <dpranke@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Erik Chen <erikchen@chromium.org>

[modify] https://crrev.com/022bff279bb2d570f7a91caf13d0a2854c5fcffb/scripts/slave/recipe_modules/filter/tests/analyze.py
[modify] https://crrev.com/022bff279bb2d570f7a91caf13d0a2854c5fcffb/scripts/slave/recipes/chromium_trybot.expected/webkit_mac_trybot_no_hermetic_toolchain.json
[modify] https://crrev.com/022bff279bb2d570f7a91caf13d0a2854c5fcffb/scripts/slave/recipes/chromium_trybot.expected/use_v8_patch_on_blink_trybot.json
[add] https://crrev.com/022bff279bb2d570f7a91caf13d0a2854c5fcffb/scripts/slave/recipe_modules/filter/tests/analyze.expected/basic_mac.json
[modify] https://crrev.com/022bff279bb2d570f7a91caf13d0a2854c5fcffb/scripts/slave/recipes/chromium_trybot.expected/use_skia_patch_on_blink_trybot.json
[modify] https://crrev.com/022bff279bb2d570f7a91caf13d0a2854c5fcffb/scripts/slave/README.recipes.md
[modify] https://crrev.com/022bff279bb2d570f7a91caf13d0a2854c5fcffb/scripts/slave/recipe_modules/chromium_tests/tests/api/trybot_steps.expected/webkit_mac_trybot_no_hermetic_toolchain.json
[modify] https://crrev.com/022bff279bb2d570f7a91caf13d0a2854c5fcffb/scripts/slave/recipe_modules/filter/api.py

Project Member

Comment 46 by bugdroid1@chromium.org, Aug 2 2017

The following revision refers to this bug:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/730ce05c38a8254f7514d5d36310c2ee0c50dfba

commit 730ce05c38a8254f7514d5d36310c2ee0c50dfba
Author: erikchen <erikchen@chromium.org>
Date: Wed Aug 02 21:13:14 2017

Reland "Bump macOS SDK to 10.12."

This is a reland of f5345de13668f0176b11126a7ae391dad5b4ad0f.
The problem with blink trybots was fixed: 
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=669240#c45

Original change's description:
> Bump macOS SDK to 10.12.
> 
> Bug:  669240 
> Change-Id: I97cf582b97fac7aec2aa92bbdda02f5c17482c1d
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/570459
> Reviewed-by: Erik Chen <erikchen@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Nico Weber <thakis@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Erik Chen <erikchen@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#491060}

Bug:  669240 
Change-Id: I73b54eedbd0eab105adecfb6e817de8aa2b968ef
TBR: thakis@chromium.org
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/598670
Reviewed-by: Erik Chen <erikchen@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Erik Chen <erikchen@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#491499}
[modify] https://crrev.com/730ce05c38a8254f7514d5d36310c2ee0c50dfba/build/config/mac/mac_sdk_overrides.gni
[modify] https://crrev.com/730ce05c38a8254f7514d5d36310c2ee0c50dfba/chrome/browser/ui/cocoa/ssl_client_certificate_selector_cocoa.mm

Project Member

Comment 47 by bugdroid1@chromium.org, Aug 14 2017

The following revision refers to this bug:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/d09279c9b7cd06cc9d1fa91c03c3a49338674041

commit d09279c9b7cd06cc9d1fa91c03c3a49338674041
Author: Nico Weber <thakis@chromium.org>
Date: Mon Aug 14 19:41:31 2017

mac: Remove workaround for a compiler bug that's now fixed.

Bug:  669240 , 735328 , 753944 
Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.chromium.mac:mac_optional_gpu_tests_rel
Change-Id: Ia478da385744cb064da270819322abc3d8789f9c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/614081
Reviewed-by: Reilly Grant <reillyg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Erik Chen <erikchen@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Nico Weber <thakis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#494135}
[modify] https://crrev.com/d09279c9b7cd06cc9d1fa91c03c3a49338674041/services/shape_detection/barcode_detection_impl_mac.h
[modify] https://crrev.com/d09279c9b7cd06cc9d1fa91c03c3a49338674041/services/shape_detection/text_detection_impl_mac.h
[modify] https://crrev.com/d09279c9b7cd06cc9d1fa91c03c3a49338674041/ui/base/cocoa/touch_bar_util.h

Project Member

Comment 48 by bugdroid1@chromium.org, Aug 14 2017

The following revision refers to this bug:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/b8e90b623d45c0588550935f29dc2c0e080798aa

commit b8e90b623d45c0588550935f29dc2c0e080798aa
Author: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Date: Mon Aug 14 21:13:27 2017

Remove dlsym indirection for SecKey APIs.

Now that we are using the 10.12 SDK, we no longer need unsafe dlsym
hacks to use SecKey APIs.

Bug:  669240 
Change-Id: I02ffed8e789f8db87ff5688181a5aff810387070
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/614082
Reviewed-by: Erik Chen <erikchen@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#494191}
[modify] https://crrev.com/b8e90b623d45c0588550935f29dc2c0e080798aa/net/ssl/ssl_platform_key_mac.cc

Project Member

Comment 49 by bugdroid1@chromium.org, Aug 14 2017

The following revision refers to this bug:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/c1dd5bd181b2f3ff26bba13ffabc357de7bc9a9f

commit c1dd5bd181b2f3ff26bba13ffabc357de7bc9a9f
Author: Findit <findit-for-me@appspot.gserviceaccount.com>
Date: Mon Aug 14 22:04:15 2017

Revert "Remove dlsym indirection for SecKey APIs."

This reverts commit b8e90b623d45c0588550935f29dc2c0e080798aa.

Reason for revert:

Findit (https://goo.gl/kROfz5) identified CL at revision 494191 as the
culprit for failures in the build cycles as shown on:
https://findit-for-me.appspot.com/waterfall/culprit?key=ag9zfmZpbmRpdC1mb3ItbWVyRAsSDVdmU3VzcGVjdGVkQ0wiMWNocm9taXVtL2I4ZTkwYjYyM2Q0NWMwNTg4NTUwOTM1ZjI5ZGMyYzBlMDgwNzk4YWEM

Sample Build: https://luci-milo.appspot.com/buildbot/chromium.webkit/WebKit%20Mac%20Builder/216314

Original change's description:
> Remove dlsym indirection for SecKey APIs.
> 
> Now that we are using the 10.12 SDK, we no longer need unsafe dlsym
> hacks to use SecKey APIs.
> 
> Bug:  669240 
> Change-Id: I02ffed8e789f8db87ff5688181a5aff810387070
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/614082
> Reviewed-by: Erik Chen <erikchen@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#494191}
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug:  669240 

Change-Id: I59fdef03a3b7ec98a644bf013c84d91551262b33
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/614469
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Reilly Grant <reillyg@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Reilly Grant <reillyg@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#494192}
[modify] https://crrev.com/c1dd5bd181b2f3ff26bba13ffabc357de7bc9a9f/net/ssl/ssl_platform_key_mac.cc

Blockedon: 659270
Project Member

Comment 51 by bugdroid1@chromium.org, Oct 2 2017

The following revision refers to this bug:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/7d7509a4ae7ff0decac81805c7727e86e083eac2

commit 7d7509a4ae7ff0decac81805c7727e86e083eac2
Author: erikchen <erikchen@chromium.org>
Date: Mon Oct 02 23:40:36 2017

macOS: Update build instructions to reflect new build requirements.

Chrome now requires Xcode 8, macOS 10.12, and 10.12 SDK.

Bug:  669240 
Change-Id: I71b0f4238ac3b7baa657bb469480c1a17eaf1e77
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/696291
Reviewed-by: Dirk Pranke <dpranke@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Erik Chen <erikchen@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#505857}
[modify] https://crrev.com/7d7509a4ae7ff0decac81805c7727e86e083eac2/docs/mac_build_instructions.md

Status: Fixed (was: Assigned)
We now build with the 10.12 SDK everywhere...I think.

Many thanks to tansell@ and dpranke@ for doing the last push and getting WebKit testers over to using the 10.12 SDK.
Project Member

Comment 53 by bugdroid1@chromium.org, Nov 2 2017

The following revision refers to this bug:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/8418e098b9cbedf884878b61dcd3292c515845cf

commit 8418e098b9cbedf884878b61dcd3292c515845cf
Author: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Date: Thu Nov 02 21:44:54 2017

Reland "Remove dlsym indirection for SecKey APIs."

This is a reland of b8e90b623d45c0588550935f29dc2c0e080798aa. Per
 https://crbug.com/669240#c52 , this should be okay now?

Original change's description:
> Remove dlsym indirection for SecKey APIs.
> 
> Now that we are using the 10.12 SDK, we no longer need unsafe dlsym
> hacks to use SecKey APIs.
> 
> Bug:  669240 
> Change-Id: I02ffed8e789f8db87ff5688181a5aff810387070
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/614082
> Reviewed-by: Erik Chen <erikchen@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#494191}

Bug:  669240 
Change-Id: I286a22ff0d3a4db4ed711e2b56d90b28e7032085
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/752101
Reviewed-by: Erik Chen <erikchen@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#513608}
[modify] https://crrev.com/8418e098b9cbedf884878b61dcd3292c515845cf/net/ssl/ssl_platform_key_mac.cc

Sign in to add a comment