Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
4.4% regression in jetstream at 433827:433861 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionGraphs included below.
,
Nov 28 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8994716153271460608
,
Nov 29 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@433826 164.75 4.06202 24 good chromium@433861 164.125 6.05186 24 bad Bisect job ran on: mac_10_11_perf_bisect Bug ID: 669186 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests jetstream Test Metric: Score/Score Relative Change: None Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_10_11_perf_bisect/builds/1065 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8994716153271460608 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5799129794478080 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Nov 29 2016
This is going to be difficult to impossible to bisect and it might be infrastructure. WontFix.
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982580514351970480 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by benhenry@chromium.org
, Nov 28 2016