New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 669184 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner:
Closed: Nov 2016
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

7.2% regression in kraken at 432946:432982

Project Member Reported by benhenry@chromium.org, Nov 28 2016

Issue description

Graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=669184

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICg24OfogoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-nexus5X
Project Member

Comment 4 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Nov 28 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: failed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@432945  4328.47  3012.78  27  good
chromium@432982  4350.08  2637.33  27  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 669184

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests kraken
Test Metric: Total/Total
Relative Change: None

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/916
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8994716463995682720


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5894008843272192

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!

Comment 5 by benhenry@google.com, Nov 28 2016

Cc: mvstan...@chromium.org
Owner: bmeu...@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)
The metric's results are bimodal. I'm not exactly sure if this benchmark should be doing that. Do you have any thoughts on what could be going wrong?
Status: WontFix (was: Assigned)
I have no idea what's going on with this perfbot, but the range doesn't even contain a V8 commit, and Kraken is a JavaScript-only benchmark, so it doesn't look like this is actually a problem with V8. Closing as WontFix from our side, dunno if you want to put infra people to look into this.
Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Nov 29 2016

Cc: jbria...@cisco.com
Owner: jbria...@cisco.com

=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author jbriance@cisco.com ===

Hi jbriance@cisco.com, the bisect results pointed to your CL below as possibly
causing a regression. Please have a look at this info and see whether
your CL be related.


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


===== SUSPECTED CL(s) =====
Subject : cc: Cleanup class/struct forward declarations
Author  : jbriance
Commit description:
  
Remove useless class and struct forward declarations, and add
missing ones in cc header files.

BUG= 662195 
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2503283002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#432964}
Commit  : 58f287687a11f1b9f35371aa708e8b93269b3974
Date    : Thu Nov 17 21:38:05 2016


===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@432161  3764.28  48.1599  12  good
chromium@432572  3745.2   35.798   5   good
chromium@432778  3764.16  11.5876  5   good
chromium@432880  3758.64  17.2642  5   good
chromium@432931  3762.35  20.4475  8   good
chromium@432957  3762.09  62.0001  18  good
chromium@432963  5981.94  16823.8  18  good
chromium@432964  14528.9  599.091  5   bad      <--
chromium@432965  14121.8  980.175  5   bad
chromium@432966  7660.85  26088.1  27  unknown
chromium@432968  7247.07  20757.4  18  bad
chromium@432969  3773.67  94.8946  27  unknown
chromium@432970  3775.79  91.9003  27  unknown
chromium@432971  3779.33  128.088  27  unknown
chromium@432982  3776.89  50.1339  18  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 669184

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests kraken
Test Metric: Total/Total
Relative Change: 0.42%

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/917
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8994716443825863616


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5787493654331392

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!

Comment 8 by jbria...@cisco.com, Nov 29 2016

Hi,

To be honest, I don't think that my CL could be related to any perf regression (it should be only code cleaning).
Please let me know if you need an action from me,

Julien

Comment 9 by benhenry@google.com, Nov 29 2016

Labels: speed-followup
Owner: bmeu...@chromium.org
Keeping with comment #6 as this regression is bimodal, so not sure what's going on - it could be infrastructure.

Sign in to add a comment