New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 668736 link

Starred by 3 users

Issue metadata

Status: Verified
Owner:
Last visit > 30 days ago
Closed: Dec 2016
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: Linux
Pri: 2
Type: Bug



Sign in to add a comment

Integer-overflow in WebRtcSpl_DotProductWithScale

Project Member Reported by ClusterFuzz, Nov 25 2016

Issue description

Detailed report: https://cluster-fuzz.appspot.com/testcase?key=5895115622318080

Fuzzer: libfuzzer_neteq_rtp_fuzzer
Job Type: libfuzzer_chrome_ubsan
Platform Id: linux

Crash Type: Integer-overflow
Crash Address: 
Crash State:
  WebRtcSpl_DotProductWithScale
  webrtc::Expand::AnalyzeSignal
  webrtc::Expand::Process
  
Regressed: https://cluster-fuzz.appspot.com/revisions?job=libfuzzer_chrome_ubsan&range=433878:433990

Minimized Testcase (2.84 Kb): https://cluster-fuzz.appspot.com/download/AMIfv96FUjO6-wHU6zS8nXn_UhXNyXfM4OeGiMYZZvjGe5PsAAFre-2SibZev8-VRITfpeYCAkL1EeVXLHuemERuMcspoPi6Ycmv7F9o8NofK2yR-pKRxx_wAvRx3TJCT36s1Occ4OCPyIWCga60pcxmjLy3MPHQQw?testcase_id=5895115622318080

Issue filed automatically.

See https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/testing/libfuzzer/reproducing.md for more information.
 

Comment 1 by ajha@chromium.org, Nov 28 2016

Labels: M-57

Comment 2 by ajha@chromium.org, Nov 28 2016

Components: Blink>WebRTC
Cc: msrchandra@chromium.org
Owner: emir...@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)
Noticing webrtc rolls change in the CL range,
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/6d1b1cb2d0fedff985eae5bd76fa13561262774e..4af1869e97cdf585994c422c22423f6d6fcf68ce?pretty=fuller

@emircan -- Could you please look into the issue, kindly re-assign if this is not related to your changes.
Thank You.
Labels: Test-Predator-Wrong-CLs
Cc: emir...@chromium.org
Owner: hlundin@chromium.org
hlundin@, can you PTAL to see if it is related to the CL below?
https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc/+/79dfdadbc861a56596a42ba9f40c8bcbf30e4d75
Components: -Blink>WebRTC Blink>WebRTC>Audio
I would not think that the indicated CL is to blame as such. Rather, I think that CL fixed another problem, which enabled the fuzzer to probe deeper and find this new problem. Nevertheless, I'll take this bug.
Cc: hlundin@chromium.org
Owner: ivoc@chromium.org
Ivo, please, take a look at this.
Project Member

Comment 9 by ClusterFuzz, Dec 17 2016

ClusterFuzz has detected this issue as fixed in range 439223:439312.

Detailed report: https://cluster-fuzz.appspot.com/testcase?key=5895115622318080

Fuzzer: libfuzzer_neteq_rtp_fuzzer
Job Type: libfuzzer_chrome_ubsan
Platform Id: linux

Crash Type: Integer-overflow
Crash Address: 
Crash State:
  WebRtcSpl_DotProductWithScale
  webrtc::Expand::AnalyzeSignal
  webrtc::Expand::Process
  
Regressed: https://cluster-fuzz.appspot.com/revisions?job=libfuzzer_chrome_ubsan&range=433878:433990
Fixed: https://cluster-fuzz.appspot.com/revisions?job=libfuzzer_chrome_ubsan&range=439223:439312

Minimized Testcase (2.84 Kb): https://cluster-fuzz.appspot.com/download/AMIfv96FUjO6-wHU6zS8nXn_UhXNyXfM4OeGiMYZZvjGe5PsAAFre-2SibZev8-VRITfpeYCAkL1EeVXLHuemERuMcspoPi6Ycmv7F9o8NofK2yR-pKRxx_wAvRx3TJCT36s1Occ4OCPyIWCga60pcxmjLy3MPHQQw?testcase_id=5895115622318080

See https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/testing/libfuzzer/reproducing.md for more information.

If you suspect that the result above is incorrect, try re-doing that job on the test case report page.
Project Member

Comment 10 by ClusterFuzz, Dec 17 2016

Labels: ClusterFuzz-Verified
Status: Verified (was: Assigned)
ClusterFuzz testcase 5895115622318080 is verified as fixed, so closing issue.

If this is incorrect, please add ClusterFuzz-Wrong label and re-open the issue.

Sign in to add a comment