PluginPowerSaverBrowserTest.BackgroundTabPlugins became flaky or more flaky on Nov 15. https://findit-for-me.appspot.com/waterfall/check-flake?master_name=chromium.win&builder_name=Win7%20Tests%20(dbg)(1)&build_number=54745&step_name=browser_tests%20on%20Windows-7-SP1&test_name=PluginPowerSaverBrowserTest.BackgroundTabPlugins https://findit-for-me.appspot.com/waterfall/check-flake?master_name=chromium.linux&builder_name=Linux%20Tests%20(dbg)(1)(32)&build_number=35597&step_name=browser_tests%20on%20Ubuntu-12.04&test_name=PluginPowerSaverBrowserTest.BackgroundTabPlugins https://findit-for-me.appspot.com/waterfall/check-flake?master_name=chromium.linux&builder_name=Linux%20Tests&build_number=48969&step_name=browser_tests%20on%20Ubuntu-12.04&test_name=PluginPowerSaverBrowserTest.BackgroundTabPlugins In the last test config, we should dig deeper into builds between 48949 and 48955, preferably automatically. Otherwise, we should make it possible to manually trigger that.
https://findit-for-me.appspot.com/waterfall/check-flake?master_name=chromium.mac&builder_name=Mac10.9%20Tests%20(dbg)&build_number=33061&step_name=browser_tests%20on%20Mac-10.9&test_name=PluginPowerSaverBrowserTest.BackgroundTabPlugins https://findit-for-me.appspot.com/waterfall/check-flake?master_name=chromium.chromiumos&builder_name=Linux%20ChromiumOS%20Tests%20(1)&build_number=29458&step_name=browser_tests%20on%20Ubuntu-12.04&test_name=PluginPowerSaverBrowserTest.BackgroundTabPlugins
Looks like these are examples for jump of flaky rate. I will make changes on this.
Please also make this bug blocked by the bug of jump detection you mentioned.
Detect dive of flake rate is in place. Closing this bug.
Comment 1 by st...@chromium.org
, Nov 21 2016