New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 667417 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression

Blocked on:
issue 669608



Sign in to add a comment

13.4% regression in thread_times.tough_scrolling_cases at 433321:433440

Project Member Reported by mustaq@chromium.org, Nov 21 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 1 by mustaq@chromium.org, Nov 21 2016

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=667417

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgq7e4rwsM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-nexus5
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Nov 21 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: failed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N    Good?
chromium@433320  42.5236  306.651  200  good
chromium@433440  46.727   377.224  200  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 667417

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests thread_times.tough_scrolling_cases
Test Metric: thread_total_all_cpu_time_per_frame/thread_total_all_cpu_time_per_frame
Relative Change: None

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/4361
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8995358004110216848


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6065859846471680

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Nov 22 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: failed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N    Good?
chromium@433320  42.8799  313.22   200  good
chromium@433440  47.0234  387.959  200  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 667417

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests thread_times.tough_scrolling_cases
Test Metric: thread_total_all_cpu_time_per_frame/thread_total_all_cpu_time_per_frame
Relative Change: None

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/4370
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8995272543890956384


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6462242210447360

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Blockedon: 669608
Project Member

Comment 8 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jan 13 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found but unable to narrow commit range

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : thread_times.tough_scrolling_cases
  Metric       : thread_total_all_cpu_time_per_frame/thread_total_all_cpu_time_per_frame

Suspected Commit Range
  30 commits in range
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/4312c9f8688669f7adb6a6102cf73e8e58777c8d..662a14a241ac885aa219849f2267acb8af0df3e5


Revision             Result                   N
chromium@433320      41.3725 +- 0.846351      6      good
chromium@433380      41.6951 +- 2.26543       6      good
chromium@433410      41.149 +- 1.03083        6      good
chromium@433440      46.846 +- 1.392          6      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests thread_times.tough_scrolling_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990640885077534320

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5837287503429632


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
All plots recovered except for:
ChromiumPerf/chromium-rel-mac10/thread_times.tough_scrolling_cases / thread_total_all_cpu_time_per_frame
which has very little regression since the original level, and it's noisy.

Sign in to add a comment