Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
21% regression in v8.browsing_desktop_ignition at 431876:432060 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Nov 16 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8995853421065222144
,
Nov 16 2016
,
Nov 16 2016
,
Nov 16 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@431875 881.539 4676.06 27 good chromium@432060 1079.16 5676.14 35 bad Bisect job ran on: mac_retina_perf_bisect Bug ID: 665757 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests v8.browsing_desktop_ignition Test Metric: v8-gc-total_sum/v8-gc-total_sum Relative Change: None Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_retina_perf_bisect/builds/1822 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8995853421065222144 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5829357673644032 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Nov 16 2016
FYI: Probable cause is 7db1864 [wrapper-tracing] Enable flag per default by mlippautz |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by jgruber@chromium.org
, Nov 16 2016