Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
4.7% regression in tab_switching.tough_energy_cases at 431649:431687 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Nov 15 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8995938784489111824
,
Nov 15 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@431648 1125.15 233.644 27 good chromium@431687 1127.15 373.188 27 bad Bisect job ran on: mac_retina_perf_bisect Bug ID: 665372 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests tab_switching.tough_energy_cases Test Metric: idle_wakeups_total/idle_wakeups_total Relative Change: None Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_retina_perf_bisect/builds/1820 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8995938784489111824 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5818520263196672 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Feb 3 2017
These regressions happened before M56 branch. M56 is now in stable. These regressions made it to the stable channel. Marking wontfix. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by toyoshim@chromium.org
, Nov 15 2016