Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
16.5% regression in blink_perf.paint at 431761:431780 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Nov 15 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8995939282754145760
,
Nov 15 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@431760 270.876 76.3607 25 good chromium@431780 267.054 61.0016 25 bad Bisect job ran on: winx64nvidia_perf_bisect Bug ID: 665363 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.paint Test Metric: large-table-repaint/large-table-repaint Relative Change: None Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64nvidia_perf_bisect/builds/1955 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8995939282754145760 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5303682801860608 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Nov 15 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8995936749697665440
,
Nov 15 2016
another bisect was kicked with a wider range
,
Nov 15 2016
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author wangxianzhu@chromium.org === Hi wangxianzhu@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL below as possibly causing a regression. Please have a look at this info and see whether your CL be related. ===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : Paint collapsed borders of a table as one display item Author : wangxianzhu Commit description: This simplifies paint invalidation logic on collapsed border changes. About performance: With this CL we create a big display item on the table containing all collapsed border paintings, instead of many small display items on cells. This will cause more painting when the display item is invalidated, but saves time to handle many cached display items. Perf try jobs [1] show that this CL actually improves performance of one test (blink_perf.paint.large-table-background-change-with-invisible-collapsed-borders.html), and doesn't affect much of performance of other tests. Cluster-telemetry run showed no change or slight progression [2]. [1] https://codereview.chromium.org/2430313004/#ps60001 [2] https://ct.skia.org/chromium_perf_runs/, run 1433 CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=master.tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_layout_tests_slimming_paint_v2 BUG= 663208 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2430313004 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#431744} Commit : c5cc11e88930c6e3f5e08b330fb14b6b571a0404 Date : Sat Nov 12 02:16:08 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@431675 239.437 35.4817 25 good chromium@431728 244.47 31.7659 25 good chromium@431741 239.684 21.9914 25 good chromium@431743 240.621 22.9428 25 good chromium@431744 264.32 43.2108 25 bad <-- chromium@431745 264.247 36.4243 25 bad chromium@431748 265.862 40.1357 25 bad chromium@431754 267.536 43.9636 25 bad chromium@431780 274.44 71.9426 25 bad Bisect job ran on: winx64nvidia_perf_bisect Bug ID: 665363 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.paint Test Metric: large-table-repaint/large-table-repaint Relative Change: 14.62% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64nvidia_perf_bisect/builds/1957 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8995936749697665440 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5858352863641600 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Nov 15 2016
The CL has been reverted for other reason.
,
Nov 15 2016
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982624099293247088 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by toyoshim@chromium.org
, Nov 15 2016