Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.9%-29.1% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 430826:430989 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Nov 15 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8995942202670374912
,
Nov 15 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@430919 4647999 3416333 27 good chromium@430924 4611947 3345454 27 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Bug ID: 665339 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/background/after_http_m_youtube_com_results_q_science Relative Change: None Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/4342 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8995942202670374912 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5211000091967488 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Nov 16 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8995862082484057744
,
Nov 16 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@430919 74303196 4005521 27 good chromium@430989 74690192 4751415 27 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus9_perf_bisect Bug ID: 665339 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=https.www.google.co.uk.hl.en.q.science memory.top_10_mobile Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:private_dirty_size_avg/background/after_https_www_google_co_uk_hl_en_q_science Relative Change: None Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus9_perf_bisect/builds/2267 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8995862082484057744 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5849353162326016 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Feb 3 2017
These regressions happened before M56 branch. M56 is now in stable. These regressions made it to the stable channel. Marking wontfix.
,
Mar 14 2017
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982651849983621280
,
Apr 11 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/background/after_http_m_youtube_com_results_q_science Revision Result N chromium@430919 4647999 +- 3416333 27 good chromium@430924 4611947 +- 3345454 27 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982651849983621280 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5211000091967488 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by toyoshim@chromium.org
, Nov 15 2016