[Diff Installers]: Generate diff installers for Latest Canary -> Latest Dev (64 PGO) |
|||||
Issue descriptionSeems like diff installers are not getting generated for "Latest Canary -> Latest Dev" for Win64 PGO builds. See here: https://pantheon.corp.google.com/storage/browser/chrome-signed/desktop-5c0tCh/56.0.2913.0/win64-pgo/?pli=1 It used to work before and has broken recently. mmoss@, could you please look into this? Thank you!
,
Nov 8 2016
Sorry, it didn't work for any of the Win64 PGO builds. However diffs are getting created for Win64 (Non-PGO) builds w/o fail.
,
Nov 8 2016
,
Nov 8 2016
I'm still not sure I understand what we should be seeing but aren't. I agree 2913 is messed up, but I'm not sure it's a general issue with PGO diffs. For instance, looking at the previous build, I see a couple diff installers: https://pantheon.corp.google.com/storage/browser/chrome-signed/desktop-5c0tCh/56.0.2912.0/win64-pgo/ 56.0.2912.0_56.0.2910.0_chrome_updater.exe 56.0.2912.0_56.0.2906.0_chrome_updater.exe It looks like that second one is a diff against the current dev channel (56.0.2906.0). I assume that's what you're expecting to see?
,
Nov 8 2016
Yes Correct. However '56.0.2912.0' & '56.0.2911.0' diffs generation seems like exception case to me. We have never seen the correct diffs got generated for 64-PGO builds except for 2911 & 2912.
,
Nov 8 2016
I think there's some conflict between the 64-bit and the 32-bit diff creation. Probably the reason the 2912 and 2911 diffs worked for win64-pgo is that those builds both happened to fail on on win-pgo, so there was no conflict. I'm not sure exactly what the conflict is, but I seem to recall that this was also an issue with the old win builders, so might not be so new, nor specific to the PGO builders.
,
Nov 8 2016
Yeah, I think this is an old problem, possibly exacerbated by the PGO builds taking a lot longer to run than the non-PGO builds. It looks the scripts only ever query Omaha for the 32-bit releases, so if the 32-bit build goes live before the 64-bit build finishes, then the 64-bit build thinks there is no older build, and you end up with meaningless diffs like: 56.0.2913.0_56.0.2913.0_chrome_updater.exe
,
Nov 9 2016
The following revision refers to this bug: https://chrome-internal.googlesource.com/chrome/tools/build/+/d51e12077dd2f577a9b43ff8f331f51c0a274664 commit d51e12077dd2f577a9b43ff8f331f51c0a274664 Author: mmoss <mmoss@google.com> Date: Wed Nov 09 05:07:16 2016
,
Nov 9 2016
The latest win64-pgo build properly identified the previous 64-bit release: [11:40:00] Channel canary: Version: 56.0.2914.0 which matches what omahaproxy shows for win64, whereas the previous win canary shows 56.0.2913.0.
,
Nov 10 2016
For some reason chrome#56.0.2914.3 has failed to generate the 64-bit PGO diff (56.0.2906.0 --> 56.0.2914.3) and we did it manually. Is something still fishy? or we fell under some exception bucket again? Thank you!
,
Nov 10 2016
The build definitely detected all the previous versions properly: https://uberchromegw.corp.google.com/i/official.desktop/builders/win64-pgo/builds/479/steps/official%20signing/logs/stdio but it only chose to create a diff against the previous canary (56.0.2914.1). I'm not that familiar with the background of diff creation, so I don't know if that logic is intentional or not.
,
Nov 10 2016
Hmm. do we know someone else who can take a look?
,
Nov 10 2016
Oh, well, I can look at the code (the file changed in #8) and figure out the logic it's using, I just don't necessarily know if that logic fits expectations, or who defines those expectations (+kerz). But, for instance, there's this line and comment: break # We don't want to match more than one channel. which sounds a lot like it's WAI, because it matched the canary channel, so it shouldn't try to diff anything else.
,
Nov 13 2016
Why would we diff from a Canary to a Dev?
,
Nov 23 2016
Reg c#14: Since we are picking latest Canary as a qualifying build for Chrome Dev releases. |
|||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||
Comment 1 by mmoss@chromium.org
, Nov 8 2016