Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2.1%-18.5% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 429300:429396 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Nov 7 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8996609541743924320
,
Nov 8 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@429359 10622976 1640331 8 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Bug ID: 663122 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_mobile Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:java_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/browse_news/browse_news_reddit Relative Change: 6.69% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/837 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8996609541743924320 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5267136941916160 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Nov 8 2016
,
Feb 3 2017
These regressions happened before M56 branch. M56 is now in stable. These regressions made it to the stable channel. Marking wontfix.
,
Mar 14 2017
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982632260610246272 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by briander...@chromium.org
, Nov 7 2016