Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1%-16% regression in page_cycler_v2.intl_hi_ru at 429270:429349 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Nov 7 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8996610072662334144
,
Nov 8 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@429304 81.2407 3.84769 18 good chromium@429305 80.1884 1.64802 18 bad Bisect job ran on: winx64intel_perf_bisect Bug ID: 663117 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests page_cycler_v2.intl_ko_th_vi Test Metric: timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___us.24h.com.vn_ Relative Change: 1.12% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64intel_perf_bisect/builds/1225 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8996610072662334144 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6441479248019456 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Nov 8 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8996523359591416496
,
Nov 9 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : Add crash keys to TaskQueueManager::ProcessTaskFromWorkQueue Author : alexclarke Commit description: We suspect a bad task closure is getting posted and would like to add crash keys to aid diagnosis. BUG=660427 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2464853002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#429285} Commit : c08c078b27b353f4ab8de7deccfb862270b1ff2a Date : Wed Nov 02 15:49:06 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@429248 69.5076 1.08375 5 good chromium@429268 69.492 1.14301 5 good chromium@429278 68.738 1.18946 5 good chromium@429283 69.4602 1.58451 5 good chromium@429284 69.8954 1.26073 5 good chromium@429285 80.73 0.973392 5 bad <-- chromium@429286 80.4798 2.50065 5 bad chromium@429288 78.943 1.2015 5 bad chromium@429328 78.9962 0.598551 5 bad chromium@429407 79.875 1.53467 5 bad Bisect job ran on: winx64intel_perf_bisect Bug ID: 663117 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...us.24h.com.vn. page_cycler_v2.intl_ko_th_vi Test Metric: timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___us.24h.com.vn_ Relative Change: 14.92% Score: 99.9 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64intel_perf_bisect/builds/1227 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8996523359591416496 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5791155298500608 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by briander...@chromium.org
, Nov 7 2016