Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
32.3%-37.9% regression in smoothness.key_silk_cases at 429246:429299 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Nov 7 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8996612128611105456
,
Nov 8 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@429267 0.233689 0.0035264 6 good chromium@429279 0.227443 0.00601578 5 good chromium@429282 0.233694 0.00218493 5 good chromium@429285 0.322666 0.00367707 5 bad chromium@429291 0.322441 0.00670251 6 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Bug ID: 663098 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests smoothness.key_silk_cases Test Metric: queueing_durations/queueing_durations Relative Change: 39.54% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/836 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8996612128611105456 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5796654064599040 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Nov 8 2016
,
Nov 28 2016
Assigning to smoothness.key_silk_cases owner ajuma@ to decide if this is actionable.
,
Nov 28 2016
There's nothing suspicious between 429282 and 429285 (which is where the bisect in #3 wound up), and the metric recovered afterwards, so I'm going to close this.
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982580626759837712 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by briander...@chromium.org
, Nov 7 2016