New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 662867 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Duplicate
Merged: issue 662391
Owner: ----
Closed: Nov 2016
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

25.1%-37.6% regression in v8.infinite_scroll_tbmv2 at 429221:429261

Project Member Reported by mlippautz@google.com, Nov 7 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=662867

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICg48fRoQsM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgk9WloAoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-mac-hdd
Cc: -mlippautz@google.com mlippautz@chromium.org u...@chromium.org
Mergedinto: 662391
Status: Duplicate (was: Untriaged)

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


===== SUSPECTED CL(s) =====
Subject : Revert "Touchpad scroll latching enabled for Mac behind flag."
Author  : sahel
Commit description:
  
This fixes Android scrollbar fading regression.

reverted cl: https://crrev.com/2256733003

TBR=aelias@chromium.org
BUG= 649122 , 526463
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=master.tryserver.blink:linux_precise_blink_rel

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2467023003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#429316}
Commit  : d6036a082e4eea1c402dbd5d294dee1581ff201a
Date    : Wed Nov 02 17:26:20 2016


===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean  Std Dev   N  Good?
chromium@429307  2.2   0.447214  5  good
chromium@429313  3.4   0.894427  5  good
chromium@429315  2.4   0.547723  5  good
chromium@429316  7.8   0.447214  5  bad    <--
chromium@429318  7.4   0.547723  5  bad
chromium@429328  7.6   0.547723  5  bad

Bisect job ran on: mac_retina_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 662867

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=flickr v8.infinite_scroll_tbmv2
Test Metric: v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_count/flickr
Relative Change: 245.45%
Score: 99.9

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_retina_perf_bisect/builds/1789
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8996648569796476576


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5785662572199936

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


===== SUSPECTED CL(s) =====
Subject : Revert "Touchpad scroll latching enabled for Mac behind flag."
Author  : sahel
Commit description:
  
This fixes Android scrollbar fading regression.

reverted cl: https://crrev.com/2256733003

TBR=aelias@chromium.org
BUG= 649122 , 526463
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=master.tryserver.blink:linux_precise_blink_rel

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2467023003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#429316}
Commit  : d6036a082e4eea1c402dbd5d294dee1581ff201a
Date    : Wed Nov 02 17:26:20 2016


===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean      Std Dev  N  Good?
chromium@429307  26430730  1997857  5  good
chromium@429313  26403045  2152074  5  good
chromium@429315  27204837  2786316  5  good
chromium@429316  49155327  6629747  5  bad    <--
chromium@429318  50619075  5754753  5  bad
chromium@429328  46396289  5975779  5  bad

Bisect job ran on: mac_retina_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 662867

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=flickr v8.infinite_scroll_tbmv2
Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_avg/flickr
Relative Change: 75.54%
Score: 99.8

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_retina_perf_bisect/builds/1790
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8996648560192343408


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6151312230580224

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean      Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@429220  46086957  5381297  18  good
chromium@429261  50418681  5529143  18  bad

Bisect job ran on: mac_hdd_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 662867

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests v8.infinite_scroll_tbmv2
Test Metric: memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_max/memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_max
Relative Change: 6.38%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_hdd_perf_bisect/builds/872
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8996656988851365312


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5806030783512576

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!

Sign in to add a comment