Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
Box-shadow conflict with background-color
Reported by
jmau...@gmail.com,
Nov 4 2016
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionChrome Version : 54.0.2840.87 (64-bit) URLs (if applicable) : http://www.parktool.com/category/new Other browsers tested: Add OK or FAIL, along with the version, after other browsers where you have tested this issue: Safari: OK Firefox: OK IE: OK Edge: OK Chromium: FAIL What steps will reproduce the problem? (1) Visit http://www.parktool.com/category/new (2) Hover over different products listed (3) Box-shadow hover effect only works when thumbnail image doesn't fully fill 185px by 160px div What is the expected result? Box-shadow should be visible when hovering on all thumbnails What happens instead? Box-shadow hover effect only visible when thumbnail image doesn't fully fill 185px by 160px div Please provide any additional information below. Attach a screenshot if possible. You can see an example video here: https://youtu.be/6cDsWfXAWZo This issue does not occur on any of the major browsers. Just occurs on Chrome in both Mac and Windows environments (haven't tested Linux). I did some troubleshooting and noticed that when I removed the background-color property from the div (in this case the .prod-image-wrapper div), the problem is resolved. Appears to be a conflict between box-shadow, background-color, and images that fill the full dimensions of a div. Is this the intended functionality?
,
Nov 8 2016
Sometimes if your mouse is hovering over one of the thumbnails when the page loads, that one in particular will work during that session. I also noticed just a moment ago that the box-shadow would sometimes work after switching from a different tab. Not sure how many you tested but on that page the following are a few products that are exhibiting the unexpected behavior: CM-25, RBS-25, PRS-22, TS-4, and all of the TAP-**. I tested in both Mac 10.11.6 and Windows 10 and the behavior was present in both. I tried a fresh install 54.0.2840.87 with all extensions disabled and the behavior was still present. However, I tried running the page in Chrome Canary and the problem was no longer present. Perhaps this has been resolved with another bug fix.
,
Nov 15 2016
Thank you for providing more feedback. Adding requester "sureshkumari@chromium.org" for another review and adding "Needs-Review" label for tracking. For more details visit https://www.chromium.org/issue-tracking/autotriage - Your friendly Sheriffbot
,
Dec 9 2016
,
Dec 9 2016
This definitely reproduces, on one of my favorite sites for random browsing (I found something I need and never knew existed). Assigning to fmalita@, because this is almost certainly due to fast path background image painting. And it's a stable regression.
,
Dec 9 2016
,
Dec 9 2016
Start somewhere around here but I now doubt that it's the cause. https://codereview.chromium.org/1949253004/ It's a major triage failure that this took more than 4 weeks to get to us.
,
Dec 9 2016
Tkent triaged many of these last night. @tkent, do you know how these escaped the bug triage rotations? Did you do a special search to find these?
,
Dec 12 2016
pdr, the Blink-wide bug rotation now covers bugs with no components. Task 3 in https://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/dev/blink/blink-triaging .
,
Dec 12 2016
Able to reproduce on Windows 10 and Mac 10.12.1 using chrome reported version #54.0.2840.87 whereas unable to reproduce in the latest canary #57.0.2948.0. Unable to reproduce the issue on linux. Reverse Bisect Information: ===================== Good build: 56.0.2910.0 Revision(430103) Bad Build : 56.0.2908.0 Revision(429486) Change Log URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/57c0a6fdc6a530bcb43f6657a8cf708752adca66..eac477641ec5fdf9e3b9ec52d46fc3a908e8503e From the above change log suspecting below change Review url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2464053003 wangxianzhu@ - Could you please check and merge the fix to M56 if it is a valid candidate. Thanks...!!
,
Dec 12 2016
Issue 673108 has been merged into this issue.
,
Dec 13 2016
The fix is already in m56. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by sureshkumari@chromium.org
, Nov 8 2016Labels: Needs-Feedback
4.0 MB
4.0 MB View Download