Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.1%-65% regression in page_cycler_v2.intl_ko_th_vi at 428976:429329 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Nov 4 2016
Bisect wasn't automatically kicked off, running manually.
,
Nov 4 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8996912552849894464
,
Nov 4 2016
Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_perf_bisect/builds/7036 Failure reason: the build has failed. Additional errors: The metric was not found in the test output. Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.
,
Nov 4 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8996910094477170368
,
Nov 4 2016
Test failed. Trying on a different bot with a smaller revision range.
,
Nov 4 2016
Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_x64_perf_bisect/builds/1527 Failure reason: the build has failed. Additional errors: The metric was not found in the test output. Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.
,
Dec 4 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8994182618795757200
,
Dec 4 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8994182613622036672
,
Dec 4 2016
=== PERF REGRESSION === === Auto-CCing suspected CL author ksakamoto@chromium.org === Hi ksakamoto@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. ===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : [loading metric] filter out events during cache warming Author : ksakamoto Commit description: The regexp in prepareTelemetryInternalEventPredicate did not match the titles of events logged by cache_temperature.py. Note for perf sheriffs: Improvements are expected in page_cycler_v2 benchmarks. BUG=catapult:#2962 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2467763002 Commit : 0d3575d73a471a53e1d1d363a349ad4536f293fc Date : Tue Nov 01 12:17:02 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@428991 1484.63 288.429 8 good chromium@428992 1493.99 431.469 8 good chromium@428992,catapult@0d3575d73a 2086.82 163.618 5 bad <-- chromium@428993 1987.96 528.198 8 bad chromium@428995 2023.26 609.306 8 bad chromium@428998 2086.15 135.821 5 bad chromium@429004 2068.3 40.8791 5 bad chromium@429017 2035.88 121.821 5 bad chromium@429043 2050.37 112.911 5 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus7_perf_bisect Bug ID: 661932 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.nationalgeographic.com. page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif Test Metric: timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___www.nationalgeographic.com_ Relative Change: 38.11% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus7_perf_bisect/builds/3530 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8994182618795757200 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5839486607425536 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Dec 4 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : [loading metric] filter out events during cache warming Author : ksakamoto Commit description: The regexp in prepareTelemetryInternalEventPredicate did not match the titles of events logged by cache_temperature.py. Note for perf sheriffs: Improvements are expected in page_cycler_v2 benchmarks. BUG=catapult:#2962 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2467763002 Commit : 0d3575d73a471a53e1d1d363a349ad4536f293fc Date : Tue Nov 01 12:17:02 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@428975 808.718 307.15 8 good chromium@428985 833.987 347.921 8 good chromium@428990 817.221 306.806 8 good chromium@428992 833.63 194.896 8 good chromium@428992,catapult@0d3575d73a 1799.2 661.554 5 bad <-- chromium@428993 1794.18 508.232 5 bad chromium@428994 1833.59 483.035 5 bad chromium@429012 1827.48 550.834 5 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus6_perf_bisect Bug ID: 661932 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.nationalgeographic.com. page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif Test Metric: timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___www.nationalgeographic.com_ Relative Change: 125.97% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus6_perf_bisect/builds/2797 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8994182613622036672 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6418317068206080 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Dec 5 2016
This is expected. My CL fixed a bug that PCv2 collected metrics from cache-warming page loads too.
,
Mar 22 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8984378730883946656
,
Mar 23 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found, tests failed to produce values Bisect Details Configuration: win_perf_bisect Benchmark : page_cycler_v2.typical_25 Metric : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___www.fifa.com_ To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter='http...www\.fifa\.com.' page_cycler_v2.typical_25 Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8984378730883946656 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4603053158694912 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by primiano@chromium.org
, Nov 3 2016