Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
570.4% regression in media.tough_video_cases_extra at 428712:428751 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Nov 3 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8997058394851724720
,
Nov 3 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@428711 9.38278 11.9287 18 good chromium@428751 7.03472 9.29641 18 bad Bisect job ran on: mac_hdd_perf_bisect Bug ID: 661841 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests media.tough_video_cases_extra Test Metric: seek/video.html?src_tulip2.ogg_type_audio Relative Change: 11.80% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_hdd_perf_bisect/builds/869 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8997058394851724720 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4552815731539968 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Nov 7 2016
Seems fixed, don't see a cause. |
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by dalecur...@chromium.org
, Nov 3 2016