Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
90.6% regression in page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he at 428985:429021 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Nov 2 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8997106591714932736
,
Nov 3 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@428984 557.705 52.7102 5 good chromium@429003 1041.2 176.338 5 bad chromium@429021 827.289 112.307 5 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus6_perf_bisect Bug ID: 661543 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he Test Metric: timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___ynet.co.il_ Relative Change: 48.34% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus6_perf_bisect/builds/2721 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8997106591714932736 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5607957461467136 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Nov 4 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8996917959340091008
,
Nov 4 2016
Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus6_perf_bisect/builds/2725 Failure reason: the build has failed. Additional errors: The metric was not found in the test output. Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.
,
Nov 4 2016
First bisect failed due to device issues, second failed due to bug 662472
,
Nov 4 2016
,
Nov 7 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8996638938729448592
,
Nov 8 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : Roll src/third_party/catapult/ 189969c9c..0d3575d73 (1 commit). Author : catapult-deps-roller Commit description: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/github.com/catapult-project/catapult.git/+log/189969c9c124..0d3575d73a47 $ git log 189969c9c..0d3575d73 --date=short --no-merges --format='%ad %ae %s' 2016-11-01 ksakamoto [loading metric] filter out events during cache warming Documentation for the AutoRoller is here: https://skia.googlesource.com/buildbot/+/master/autoroll/README.md If the roll is causing failures, see: http://www.chromium.org/developers/tree-sheriffs/sheriff-details-chromium#TOC-Failures-due-to-DEPS-rolls CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=master.tryserver.chromium.android:android_optional_gpu_tests_rel TBR=catapult-sheriff@chromium.org Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2466903002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#428993} Commit : 3ce6f32d4fe45f351530fc4aef06d751e51d83cb Date : Tue Nov 01 14:05:35 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@428987 479.251 48.8048 8 good chromium@428991 526.077 115.595 8 good chromium@428992 717.58 127.934 27 good chromium@428992,catapult@0d3575d73a 798.28 106.925 27 good chromium@428993 711.256 105.633 27 bad <-- chromium@428994 732.232 87.7217 8 bad chromium@429001 713.558 132.754 8 bad chromium@429015 776.679 101.456 5 bad chromium@429043 709.479 96.5582 5 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus9_perf_bisect Bug ID: 661543 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...ynet.co.il. page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he Test Metric: timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___ynet.co.il_ Relative Change: 50.95% Score: 0.0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus9_perf_bisect/builds/2236 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8996638938729448592 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5341727638945792 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Nov 10 2016
,
Feb 3 2017
These regressions happened before M56 branch. M56 is now in stable. These regressions made it to the stable channel. Marking wontfix.
,
Mar 14 2017
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982611844685355360
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982611827112253136 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by primiano@chromium.org
, Nov 2 2016