Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
11.2% regression in memory.top_10_mobile_stress at 428181:428224 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Nov 2 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8997108547334803504
,
Nov 2 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@428180 58775575 6294622 18 good chromium@428224 60271435 5420870 18 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus9_perf_bisect Bug ID: 661527 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile_stress Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:cc:effective_size_avg/foreground/https_mobile_twitter_com_justinbieber_skip_interstitial_true Relative Change: 11.08% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus9_perf_bisect/builds/2228 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8997108547334803504 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5824503739842560 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Nov 2 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8997098566298503664
,
Nov 3 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : Add field trial config for CSSExternalScanner experiment Author : csharrison Commit description: BUG= 596676 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2454823004 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#428146} Commit : 90f9f786e88b196d391e6daffb4c9ab7ca7087ab Date : Thu Oct 27 21:33:49 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@427812 49988484 7458448 12 good chromium@428018 46709104 0.0 5 good chromium@428121 46709104 0.0 5 good chromium@428134 46709104 0.0 5 good chromium@428141 49658224 6594433 5 good chromium@428144 46709104 0.0 12 good chromium@428145 48535237 6325911 12 good chromium@428146 54456666 7195432 8 bad <-- chromium@428147 61161976 3549059 8 bad chromium@428173 59806691 7321774 5 bad chromium@428224 61202466 3554719 8 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus9_perf_bisect Bug ID: 661527 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=https.mobile.twitter.com.justinbieber.skip.interstitial.true memory.top_10_mobile_stress Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:cc:effective_size_avg/foreground/https_mobile_twitter_com_justinbieber_skip_interstitial_true Relative Change: 22.32% Score: 98.0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus9_perf_bisect/builds/2231 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8997098566298503664 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5903618648047616 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by primiano@chromium.org
, Nov 2 2016