Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
5.2% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 427813:428224 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Nov 2 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8997110350892339152
,
Nov 4 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@427812 183783879 8655437 18 good chromium@428224 188114261 4531427 18 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus6_perf_bisect Bug ID: 661514 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:gpu_memory:proportional_resident_size_avg/foreground/https_mobile_twitter_com_justinbieber_skip_interstitial_true Relative Change: 2.21% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus6_perf_bisect/builds/2719 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8997110350892339152 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5817076667645952 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Nov 4 2016
,
Feb 3 2017
These regressions happened before M56 branch. M56 is now in stable. These regressions made it to the stable channel. Marking wontfix.
,
Mar 14 2017
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by primiano@chromium.org
, Nov 2 2016