Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.5% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 428221:428276 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Nov 2 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8997111169687001008
,
Nov 2 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@428220 52193328 406579 5 good chromium@428276 53125860 475629 8 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Bug ID: 661499 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_mobile Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/load_tools/load_tools_weather Relative Change: 2.04% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/821 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8997111169687001008 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5886683055128576 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Nov 4 2016
,
Nov 23 2016
This metric has improved by a lot since this regression. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by primiano@chromium.org
, Nov 2 2016