New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 661102 link

Starred by 2 users

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Feb 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

1.1%-1.5% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 428352:428424

Project Member Reported by kouhei@google.com, Nov 1 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean      Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@428372  12276066  150815   18  good
chromium@428399  12281533  158478   18  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_one_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 661102

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile
Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size_avg/background/after_http_en_m_wikipedia_org_wiki_Science
Relative Change: 0.74%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_one_perf_bisect/builds/1774
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8997210713123949664


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6429033607200768

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
These regressions happened before M56 branch. M56 is now in stable. These regressions made it to the stable channel. Marking wontfix.
Labels: Performance-Memory

Sign in to add a comment