Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
11.9%-39.9% regression in page_cycler_v2.typical_25 at 427818:427853 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 28 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8997521088866454224
,
Oct 29 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@427824 134.139 1.66063 8 good chromium@427835 134.117 2.57727 18 good chromium@427840 135.504 1.8275 18 bad chromium@427845 206.334 53.7333 12 bad Bisect job ran on: mac_retina_perf_bisect Bug ID: 660550 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh Test Metric: timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.baidu.com_s?wd_%D0%C2%20%CE%C5 Relative Change: 63.71% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_retina_perf_bisect/builds/1774 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8997521088866454224 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6377092822859776 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Oct 29 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8997428692553415584
,
Oct 29 2016
Re-running biscet. >:-|
,
Oct 29 2016
Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_retina_perf_bisect/builds/1775 Failure reason: the build has failed. Additional errors: The metric was not found in the test output. Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.
,
Oct 29 2016
Cannot bisect. I get a different "infra failure" reason each time.
,
Oct 31 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8997270505124230448
,
Oct 31 2016
Kicking off a bisect on the Mac 11 bot, which has a smaller revision range and also to check if it's less error prone than the retina.
,
Oct 31 2016
Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_10_11_perf_bisect/builds/984 Failure reason: the build has failed. Additional errors: The metric was not found in the test output. Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.
,
Oct 31 2016
Dave, can you take a look as part of your bug triage rotation?
,
Jan 17 2017
,
Feb 8 2017
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982652103250704928
,
Apr 11 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found, tests failed to produce values Bisect Details Configuration: mac_10_11_perf_bisect Benchmark : page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh Metric : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.baidu.com_s?wd_%D0%C2%20%CE%C5 To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter='http...www\.baidu\.com.s\?wd.\%D0\%C2\%20\%CE\%C5' page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982652103250704928 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5046619999830016 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982620101670997504 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by m...@chromium.org
, Oct 28 2016