Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
18.2%-32.3% regression in page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh at 427563:427630 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 28 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8997521337587972896
,
Oct 28 2016
Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64_zen_perf_bisect/builds/573 Failure reason: the build has failed due to infrastructure failure.
,
Oct 29 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8997435078689503184
,
Oct 29 2016
Bisect bot seems to be green again. Re-running bisect on cleaner test data and w/ wider range...
,
Oct 29 2016
Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64_zen_perf_bisect/builds/575 Failure reason: the build has failed. Additional errors: The metric was not found in the test output. Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.
,
Oct 29 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8997428347478960144
,
Oct 29 2016
Retrying on narrower range (hopefully w/o a build error).
,
Oct 29 2016
Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64_zen_perf_bisect/builds/576 Failure reason: the build has failed due to infrastructure failure.
,
Oct 29 2016
Another one: Each run results in a different "infra failure." Cannot proceed without a successful bisect.
,
Oct 31 2016
In two of the failures, there is the same infra failure, filed bug 660841 for it. In https://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64_zen_perf_bisect/builds/575 there is no test output. I can't find the stdio of the test. Roberto, can you see the problem here?
,
Feb 3 2017
These regressions happened before M56 branch. M56 is now in stable. These regressions made it to the stable channel. Marking wontfix.
,
Mar 14 2017
,
Apr 10 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982671299796997872
,
Apr 10 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found, tests failed to produce values Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect Benchmark : page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh Metric : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___www.qq.com_ To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter='http...www\.qq\.com.' page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982671299796997872 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4947749181587456 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982620172792016320
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982592655831976288
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982576489303082448 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by m...@chromium.org
, Oct 28 2016