New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 660547 link

Starred by 3 users

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Feb 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

18.2%-32.3% regression in page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh at 427563:427630

Project Member Reported by m...@chromium.org, Oct 28 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Oct 28 2016

Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64_zen_perf_bisect/builds/573
Failure reason: the build has failed due to infrastructure failure.

Comment 5 by m...@chromium.org, Oct 29 2016

Bisect bot seems to be green again. Re-running bisect on cleaner test data and w/ wider range...
Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Oct 29 2016

Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64_zen_perf_bisect/builds/575
Failure reason: the build has failed.
Additional errors:
The metric was not found in the test output.
Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.

Comment 8 by m...@chromium.org, Oct 29 2016

Retrying on narrower range (hopefully w/o a build error).
Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Oct 29 2016

Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64_zen_perf_bisect/builds/576
Failure reason: the build has failed due to infrastructure failure.

Comment 10 by m...@chromium.org, Oct 29 2016

Cc: sullivan@chromium.org
Labels: Performance-Sheriff-BotHealth
Another one: Each run results in a different "infra failure." Cannot proceed without a successful bisect.
Cc: robert...@chromium.org
In two of the failures, there is the same infra failure, filed  bug 660841  for it.

In https://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64_zen_perf_bisect/builds/575 there is no test output. I can't find the stdio of the test. Roberto, can you see the problem here?
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
These regressions happened before M56 branch. M56 is now in stable. These regressions made it to the stable channel. Marking wontfix.
Labels: Performance-Loading
Project Member

Comment 15 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 10 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found, tests failed to produce values

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh
  Metric       : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___www.qq.com_


To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter='http...www\.qq\.com.' page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982671299796997872

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4947749181587456


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Sign in to add a comment