New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 660157 link

Starred by 2 users

Issue metadata

Status: Archived
Owner:
Closed: Feb 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

4.1% regression in thread_times.key_idle_power_cases at 427004:427004

Project Member Reported by m...@chromium.org, Oct 27 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 1 by m...@chromium.org, Oct 27 2016

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=660157

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgvdLSqwkM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-nexus5
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Oct 28 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev    N   Good?
chromium@427003  3.03229  0.0107465  18  good
chromium@427004  3.03357  0.0119996  18  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 660157

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests thread_times.key_idle_power_cases
Test Metric: tasks_per_second_total_all/set-timeout.html (Long Idle)
Relative Change: 0.22%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/4301
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8997615226750456160


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5847626690330624

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!

Comment 5 by m...@chromium.org, Oct 28 2016

Re-running with wider rev range to improve confidence.

Comment 8 by m...@chromium.org, Oct 29 2016

Retrying bisect again...

Comment 10 by m...@chromium.org, Oct 29 2016

Cc: sullivan@chromium.org
Labels: Performance-Sheriff-BotHealth
I give up. Infra is broken on the android_nexus5_perf_bisect bot.
Owner: dtu@chromium.org
Dave, can you take a look at the failed bisects as part of your bug triage rotation?
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)

Comment 13 by dtu@chromium.org, Feb 8 2017

Status: Archived (was: Assigned)

Sign in to add a comment