Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
5.3% regression in angle_perftests/Textures_d3d11_8_textures_5_rebind_3_state_8_mips/score on chromium-rel-win7-gpu-nvidia at 427479:427537 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionPerformance dashboard identified a 5.3% regression in angle_perftests/Textures_d3d11_8_textures_5_rebind_3_state_8_mips/score on chromium-rel-win7-gpu-nvidia at revision range 427479:427537. Graph: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/report?masters=ChromiumPerf&bots=chromium-rel-win7-gpu-nvidia&tests=angle_perftests%2FTextures_d3d11_8_textures_5_rebind_3_state_8_mips%2Fscore&checked=score%2Cscore_ref%2Cref&rev=427537 Geoff can you investigate? I also recommend you rename these tests to not have this ridiculous number of parameters in the name. I think I suggested you do this in the code review as well.
,
Oct 27 2016
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author geofflang@chromium.org === Hi geofflang@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL below as possibly causing a regression. Please have a look at this info and see whether your CL be related. ===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : Add stubs for EGL_EXT_swap_buffers_with_damage. Author : Geoff Lang Commit description: BUG= 512090 Change-Id: I9413d6f5c13b9ea59ab9c923dc6c5d157f344166 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/291652 Commit-Queue: Geoff Lang <geofflang@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jamie Madill <jmadill@chromium.org> Commit : a284f2ff19d51d6e06c216772d69dff25e189dc3 Date : Mon Oct 24 17:35:47 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@427191 1589.6 10.5024 5 good chromium@427218 1594.0 5.61249 5 good chromium@427225 1594.8 6.45755 5 good chromium@427227 1596.4 5.94138 5 good chromium@427227,angle@a284f2ff19 1557.4 5.17687 5 bad <-- chromium@427227,angle@7efe747cb0 1554.0 23.0868 5 bad chromium@427227,angle@2a1e8b6b06 1561.6 6.58027 5 bad chromium@427228 1559.2 6.6106 5 bad chromium@427229 1560.8 4.81664 5 bad chromium@427232 1569.8 1.30384 5 bad chromium@427245 1561.6 7.50333 5 bad Bisect job ran on: winx64nvidia_perf_bisect Bug ID: 659698 Test Command: .\src\out\Release_x64\angle_perftests.exe --test-launcher-print-test-stdio=always --test-launcher-jobs=1 Test Metric: Textures_d3d11_8_textures_5_rebind_3_state_8_mips/score Relative Change: 1.76% Score: 98.0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64nvidia_perf_bisect/builds/1937 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8997714838317717712 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5297970600214528 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Apr 18 2017
Closing this, we never got a good regression range. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Oct 26 2016