All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=659622

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgveTSpAoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgvcuBsgoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgvdmpqAoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgvfXlpAsM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgvdnduQoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgveDJtgsM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICg3deNqAoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgveyGsgkM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

win-zenbook

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8997739337017138448

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@427350  160.8    13.469   18  good
chromium@427388  161.494  15.8885  18  bad

Bisect job ran on: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 659622

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests smoothness.tough_webgl_cases
Test Metric: mean_frame_time/http___kenrussell.github.io_webgl-animometer_Animometer_tests_3d_webgl.html
Relative Change: 6.29%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64_zen_perf_bisect/builds/567
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8997739337017138448


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5231376326983680

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8997722039980316304

Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64_zen_perf_bisect/builds/569
Failure reason: the build has failed.
Additional errors:
The metric was not found in the test output.
Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.

These regressions happened before M56 branch. M56 is now in stable. These regressions made it to the stable channel. Marking wontfix.

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982636249643998928

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found, tests failed to produce values

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : smoothness.tough_webgl_cases
  Metric       : mean_frame_time/http___webglsamples.org_aquarium_aquarium.html


To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter='http...webglsamples\.org.aquarium.aquarium\.html' smoothness.tough_webgl_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982636249643998928

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5250119631372288


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!