Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
489.8% regression in page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh at 413414:424862 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 26 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8997755337604188272
,
Oct 26 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@413413 40.0874 0.96765 5 good Bisect job ran on: linux_perf_bisect Bug ID: 659510 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh Test Metric: timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.google.com.hk__q_%E9%82%84%E6%8F%90%E4%BE%9B_fp_c44d333e710cb480 Relative Change: None Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/linux_perf_bisect/builds/6794 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8997755337604188272 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6148283460747264 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Nov 1 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8997231437710475616
,
Nov 1 2016
Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus6_perf_bisect/builds/2710 Failure reason: the build has failed. Additional errors: The metric was not found in the test output. Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.
,
Dec 17 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993072610386948688
,
Dec 17 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: No values were found while testing the reference range. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@413413 105.149 1200.13 21 good chromium@424862 N/A N/A 0 bad Bisect job ran on: linux_perf_bisect Bug ID: 659510 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.google.com.hk..q..E9.82.84.E6.8F.90.E4.BE.9B.fp.c44d333e710cb480 page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh Test Metric: timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.google.com.hk__q_%E9%82%84%E6%8F%90%E4%BE%9B_fp_c44d333e710cb480 Relative Change: 100.00% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/linux_perf_bisect/builds/6946 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993072610386948688 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6363262113808384 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982651682151447216
,
Jul 27 2017
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by tapted@chromium.org
, Oct 26 2016