Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2% regression in memory.top_10_mobile_stress at 427129:427173 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 25 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8997830872422313616
,
Oct 25 2016
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author gangwu@chromium.org === Hi gangwu@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL below as possibly causing a regression. Please have a look at this info and see whether your CL be related. ===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : [USS] Show USS counters in Types tab Author : gangwu Commit description: Update the commit/update counters for USS BUG= 328606 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2420213002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#427156} Commit : 79b625d97774cda6ebf7fe914236bd985cbd002f Date : Mon Oct 24 21:26:22 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@427128 1253376 0.0 5 good chromium@427151 1261568 0.0 5 good chromium@427154 1265664 0.0 5 good chromium@427155 1265664 0.0 5 good chromium@427156 1269760 0.0 5 bad <-- chromium@427157 1269760 0.0 5 bad chromium@427162 1269760 0.0 5 bad chromium@427173 1288602 42131.1 5 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Bug ID: 659091 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile_stress Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:ashmem:proportional_resident_size_avg/background/after_http_yandex_ru_touchsearch_text_science Relative Change: 2.81% Score: 99.9 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/4281 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8997830872422313616 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5854495349669888 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Nov 8 2016
Is there a way to re-run the test? It seems my CL is not related to the issue.
,
Nov 8 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8996568901843245072
,
Nov 8 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : Introduce Layout*::adjustVisualRectForRasterEffects and use it for SVG hairlines. Author : chrishtr Commit description: BUG= 651511 CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=master.tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_layout_tests_slimming_paint_v2 NOTRY=true (added after it passed on all CQ bots except android which failed because of Java heap error) Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2444593002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#427125} Commit : e0679d9453c26e2c2c1de1d3bfefadc7f83a364a Date : Mon Oct 24 19:52:23 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@427000 1249280 0.0 5 good chromium@427100 1249280 0.0 5 good chromium@427113 1245594 915.893 5 good chromium@427119 1245184 0.0 5 good chromium@427122 1245184 0.0 12 good chromium@427124 1261056 36123.5 12 good chromium@427125 1265152 33307.6 8 bad <-- chromium@427150 1261978 915.893 5 bad chromium@427200 1269760 0.0 5 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Bug ID: 659091 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http.yandex.ru.touchsearch.text.science memory.top_10_mobile_stress Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:ashmem:proportional_resident_size_avg/background/after_http_yandex_ru_touchsearch_text_science Relative Change: 1.64% Score: 80.0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/4327 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8996568901843245072 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5226978326609920 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Nov 10 2016
It seems this run hit a issue before my check-in. I should assign this bug to new issue owner, or wait another run which can go through my code?
,
Nov 10 2016
I'm really sorry about this. Ashmem is a very noisy metric, which explains why the bisects came back incorrect. It wasn't supposed to be monitored, I'm working on fixing that in bug 664098 . |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by alexclarke@chromium.org
, Oct 25 2016