New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 659051 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Feb 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression

Blocked on:
issue 659530



Sign in to add a comment

6.1% regression in thread_times.key_idle_power_cases at 426635:426712

Project Member Reported by alexclarke@chromium.org, Oct 25 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=659051

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICg3Yn6sgoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-nexus5
Project Member

Comment 4 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Oct 25 2016

Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/4277
Failure reason: the build has failed.
Additional errors:
The metric was not found in the test output.
Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.

Trying another wider bisect.
Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Oct 25 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev    N   Good?
chromium@426634  4.26982  0.0553971  18  good
chromium@426712  4.27159  0.0301162  18  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 659051

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests thread_times.key_idle_power_cases
Test Metric: tasks_per_second_total_all/css-animation.html
Relative Change: 0.45%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/4276
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8997836284170964320


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5826246745784320

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 8 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Oct 25 2016

Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/4282
Failure reason: the build has failed.
Additional errors:
The revision range could not be expanded, or the commit positions could not be resolved into commit hashes.

Project Member

Comment 10 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Oct 26 2016

Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/4288
Failure reason: the build has failed.
Additional errors:
The metric was not found in the test output.
Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.

Blockedon: 659530
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
These regressions happened before M56 branch. M56 is now in stable. These regressions made it to the stable channel. Marking wontfix.
Labels: Performance-Power
Project Member

Comment 15 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 11 2017

Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/4853
Failure reason: the build has failed due to infrastructure failure.

Sign in to add a comment