Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
3.2% regression in jetstream at 426787:426852 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 25 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8997836337801965904
,
Oct 25 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@426786 207.2 0.447214 5 good chromium@426819 208.8 0.447214 5 good chromium@426822 208.2 1.09545 5 good chromium@426823 208.2 0.447214 5 good chromium@426823,v8@a8e30c0e68 208.8 0.83666 5 good chromium@426823,v8@a4ff04ab13 208.2 0.447214 5 good chromium@426823,v8@e31e5e91a5 202.4 0.894427 5 bad chromium@426823,v8@dd614f55ce 202.8 0.447214 5 bad chromium@426824 203.4 0.547723 5 bad chromium@426828 202.8 0.83666 5 bad chromium@426836 203.0 1.0 5 bad chromium@426852 203.4 1.51658 5 bad Bisect job ran on: winx64nvidia_perf_bisect Bug ID: 659049 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests jetstream Test Metric: Score/Score Relative Change: 1.83% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64nvidia_perf_bisect/builds/1934 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8997836337801965904 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5897825932541952 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Oct 26 2016
Strange the bot didn't finger one of the patches (v8@e31e5e91a5) I'll run it again with more iterations.
,
Oct 26 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8997750976728938656
,
Oct 26 2016
Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64nvidia_perf_bisect/builds/1936 Failure reason: the build has failed. Additional errors: The metric was not found in the test output. Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.
,
Oct 26 2016
,
Feb 3 2017
These regressions happened before M56 branch. M56 is now in stable. These regressions made it to the stable channel. Marking wontfix. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by alexclarke@chromium.org
, Oct 25 2016