New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 659049 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Feb 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression

Blocked on:
issue 659530



Sign in to add a comment

3.2% regression in jetstream at 426787:426852

Project Member Reported by alexclarke@chromium.org, Oct 25 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=659049

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgnbnOqwoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win7-gpu-nvidia
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Oct 25 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision                       Mean   Std Dev   N  Good?
chromium@426786                207.2  0.447214  5  good
chromium@426819                208.8  0.447214  5  good
chromium@426822                208.2  1.09545   5  good
chromium@426823                208.2  0.447214  5  good
chromium@426823,v8@a8e30c0e68  208.8  0.83666   5  good
chromium@426823,v8@a4ff04ab13  208.2  0.447214  5  good
chromium@426823,v8@e31e5e91a5  202.4  0.894427  5  bad
chromium@426823,v8@dd614f55ce  202.8  0.447214  5  bad
chromium@426824                203.4  0.547723  5  bad
chromium@426828                202.8  0.83666   5  bad
chromium@426836                203.0  1.0       5  bad
chromium@426852                203.4  1.51658   5  bad

Bisect job ran on: winx64nvidia_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 659049

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests jetstream
Test Metric: Score/Score
Relative Change: 1.83%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64nvidia_perf_bisect/builds/1934
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8997836337801965904


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5897825932541952

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Strange the bot didn't finger one of the patches (v8@e31e5e91a5) I'll run it again with more iterations.
Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Oct 26 2016

Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64nvidia_perf_bisect/builds/1936
Failure reason: the build has failed.
Additional errors:
The metric was not found in the test output.
Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.

Blockedon: 659530
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
These regressions happened before M56 branch. M56 is now in stable. These regressions made it to the stable channel. Marking wontfix.

Sign in to add a comment